AMERICAN BORDERS
TO BE DISMANTLED
I Don't Understand why Material on "American Borders" is displayed on International Section of the Website
The first reason is that many of our readers are Americans and we want to continue to provide them with the most relevant and up-to-date material as possible.
The Second Reason is that despite appearances to the contrary, it is DOMESTIC American Law, which is still acting as the Last Restraint against Globalist Agendas and a Globalist Agenda to destroy all governments of nations and replace them with Commissions, Secretariats, and rule by Unelected Bureaucrats under a global system of U.N. Regional Governments. It is the laws and the Rights that the American People STILL HAVE, which is preventing Globalists from moving faster.
Most of these globalist bureaucrats also control many of the Global and Multinational Corporations that harm the environment and that disregard the will of the People.
It is the current Globalist Agenda to replace the Sovereign American Government with a New Governmental Structure called the New North America or the North American Community.
This new Globalist North American Community will be composed of 5 top Bureaucrats from Canada, 5 top Bureaucrats from the United States, and 5 top Bureaucrats from Mexico. However, this plan has STILL not been implemented and it can be resisted - if enough people act now.
IF the United States government is superceded by the North American Community, there will be NO RESTRAINT against the United Nations or their Rules. The U.N. bureaucrats have serious plans to take control of all local communities down to the local level. When that happens, Codex Alimentarius and your vitamins will become the LEAST of your concerns.
Only by working to support the American Laws, the American Bill of Rights and the American Constitution is there a chance to be able to prevent the coming move to a system of global slavery under Multinational Corporations and their Bureaucratic allies at the United Nations.
We are against Multinational Corporations that hurt people and harm the Environment.
We support the rights of the people - the common people.
We support global rights for each and every person on this planet.
We support the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
May God Bless America
May God bless all countries rooted in his laws and in law which affirms the Rights of All men (mankind)
to live FREE
SECTION ON CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
SHOWING YOU HOW IT WILL AFFECT YOUR VITAMINS, YOUR SUPPLEMENTS, AND YOUR FOOD SUPPLY
(Yes, the CODEX ALIMENTARIUS Material and Documentation DOES exist, and YES, Your Vitamins & Supplements will be VERY affected)
Please Note: We DO Update the Sections of the Website (such as Codex Alimentarius, CAFTA, Global Treaties, Current Legislation NOW in Congress) even though we do not always update the Main Page
Credentials of the U.N. Law of the Sea Court Judges
Informal Procedures of the U.N: the case of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)
Law of the Sea Treaty Court (Tribunal)
Bill
of Rights of the United States (PDF)
Relevant BOOKS for those Interested:
Those with no background in the topics below may want to start here (short article: MECHANISMS OF CORPORATE RULE)
The relationship between CAFTA and the Global Corporations is that it is THEIR Legislation, FOR them and AGAINST the MIDDLE CLASS. Its hard to have both 1. slave wages AND 2. a Middle Class
The Case Against Free Trade: Gatt, Nafta and the Globalization of Corporate Power
Exporting America : Why Corporate Greed Is Shipping American Jobs Overseas by Lou Dobbs
Global Governance: Enhancing Trilateral Cooperation by The Trilateral Commission (more Here)
When Corporations Rule the World
Gangs of America: The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy
(or take a look at this small piece on Environmental Agenda Setting)
The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special Interests, and the Betrayal of the Public Trust
No Place for Amateurs: How Political Consultants Are Reshaping American Democracy
Indeed, the growth of the middle class-one of the underpinnings of democracy in this country-has been reversed. By government action.
Taken as a whole, these are results of the rules that govern the game:
Question: Is your Point of View "Right" or "Left" ?
We don't care about labels. We care about truth and facts, and believe that many sides have many pieces of the political truth about what is happening in the world. We are against large Multinational corporations that harm the people, impovrish countries, and destroy the middle classes. Our point of view is in believing in the Average American, and in the Integrity of the American Worker. We support the Middle Class, and government that stays out of the way of the People, and that will stop expanding and expanding and expanding its power, and its reach and its goals. We cannot be in favor of multinational and globalist agreements that are designed either to hurt America or the American Worker or the Family (meaning Dad, Mom and the kids) - or that are designed to continue to harm and erode American Sovereignty because the politicians find the will of the people to be something which is "inconvenient".
There is no "one piece" of legislation that can be opposed. Most of them have to be opposed and to be opposed continuously. It is a long process. But liberty - a small amount of it - is all that remains with which to fight. If we do not use it to stand up, there will soon be no liberty left, and no country either.
Electronic Privacy Information Center - Practical Privacy Tools
Microsoft XP Spying on You
Microsoft has programmed Windows XP to contact other computers and transfer information from the user's computer to the other computers:
a) If you have only three DVDs that your children watch sometimes on your home machine that is always connected to the Internet (through a broadband connection), you may not care that Microsoft knows when they watch them. If you seldom use the Windows XP help facility, you may not care that Microsoft is able to know the level of expertise of the people who use your computer.
However, if you are using Windows XP in a large corporation or a government, the fact that another organization believes that it can gather data from you may be completely unacceptable.
This article is support for your own investigation.
The Microsoft article tells how to disable the hidden downloading. However, the disabling is very time-consuming. Also, Microsoft has a history of using defect fixes and security fixes to change the operating system settings. This means that all the settings would need to be checked after every defect fix or security vulnerability fix.
Source: http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm
Article in Spanish http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft-es.htm
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that IE cannot
Zone Alarm - Firewall Protection - Free version at:
http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/company/products/znalm/freeDownload.jsp
Webroot Spysweeper (look for Try It - Spy Sweeper)
Popup Blocker (Panicware) (look for the Free Version)
Spybot Search & Destroy (better for older systems)
Love your Oppressor
CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
We would love to hear from you.
Please Feel Free to write to us and share your comments, and your concerns and questions. We can be reached at codextruth@yahoo.com
Please
Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe
Is not
correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention.
Thank you
KEY LEGAL CASES INVOLVING FREE SPEECH and the FIRST AMENDMENT
(TO U.S. Bill of Rights, Rights that ALL American Citizens have)
Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496 (1939).
The United States Supreme Court held that citizens have a "guaranteed access" to streets, parks, and other "traditional public forum." The privilege to use the streets and parks for communication of views may be regulated in the best interests of all, but it must not, under the guise of regulation, be abridged or denied. Mere inconvenience to the government will not outweigh free speech interests. The government must use the least restrictive means of achieving legitimate, content neutral objectives.
Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939). The United States Supreme Court did not allow cities to completely forbid leaflet distribution in order to prevent littering. The objective of keeping the streets clean does not outweigh the right to distribute literature in public.
Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965). Public officials may
not be given overly broad discretion to grant or deny permits or licenses for free speech.
Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940). Speech may
not be prohibited merely because it offends some listeners.
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951). The United States Supreme Court did not allow a permit to include any restrictions on a speaker's right of free expression. Permits may not be used as a prior restraint on free speech activities. Inappropriate or illegal activities may only be punished after they have occurred.
Forsyth County v. The Nationalist Movement, 112 S.Ct. 2395
(1992). A city may not consider the listeners' reaction to a speaker when permitting free speech activities.
Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965). Hecklers may
not be allowed to veto a speaker's right of free speech. Police must control a crowd rather than arrest the speaker in order to maintain order. Regulations may be imposed on free speech to control traffic flow.
Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969). Peaceful marching, chanting, and singing is protected by the First Amendment.
Grayned v. Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (1972). Free speech expression may be regulated for noise content in appropriate places such as hospitals or schools
while classes are in session. The general test is to ask whether the expressive activity is basically incompatible with the normal activities of a particular place at a particular time. Unamplified speech is permissible for "street preachers" on public streets.
