The Canon of the New Testament
The Books of the Bible that belong in the official Canon
So Who decided the Cannon of the New Testament ? The short
answer is: the Apostles and other Disciples of Christ who worked with the
Apostles.
As Disciples wrote to one another, and wrote to the churches, their letters
would be evaluated according to its contents. Some of the letters that the
Disciples/Apostles wrote are no longer around. Does that prove that God did not
know what was going on, or that he forgot to preserve those texts ?
Not at all. It simply means that those letters were not intended to be part of
the Bible. As the various churches accepted the teachings of the Apostles of
Jesus, they also accepted their teachings on the Cannon of Scripture, and which
books were to be considered part of the actual Bible.
However, not all of the books of the Bible were written at the same time. There
were years when nothing new was written. But John, the Apostle of Jesus was the
last living apostle, and the one who wrote the book of Revelation [called
Apocalypse in Catholic Bibles], and until that point, the Cannon of the New
Testament was not closed. When John died and had finished writing Revelation,
the Canon became a closed canon.
The Apostles had been faithful to their task. They had trained local Pastors,
established independent Bible believing congregations. Each of these churches
had copies of the parchments, scrolls and papyri that are the passages of the
Greek New Testament, that today we continue to find all over the world.
So The Apostles & Disciples of Jesus Christ are the ones who had control
over the books of the Bible and that cannon, and they are the ones who made
the decision of what to omit and what to include.
God did not forget anything. There are no books of the Bible waiting to be
discovered. His Sovereignty rules and overrules so that His will is done.
It is important to recognize that the Apostles and Disciples were on the road
throughout the Roman Empire (& further) almost all of the time for almost
all of their lives. They could have included a book in the Bible that said
"Oh Yes, Peter will be the head guy and he will establish a line of
succession". But that is not at all what took place.
Peter was rebuked by Paul for erring in the beginning of his ministry. Yet,
Peter continued to be faithful to the Lord in many ways - as 1 Peter and 2 Peter
testify to. But the center of the Church was originally in Jerusalem not Rome.
The Reason why Rome had prominence was because it was the chief city of the
Roman Empire. Those that wanted Spiritual power and authority (to do valid work
of ministry and evangelism) worked with the disciples & apostles and
traveled with. Those who instead wanted political power and influence went to
Rome.
It was only when the Bishop of Rome, much later (around 280 AD) realized that he
could gain even more power by alliances with the Emperor, that he realized that
he could have a monopoly - through political influence - that most other
bishops...in time...would not be able to compete with (if this is being measured
by Political power).
But even in his continued first attempts to exert his so called influence, the
Bishop of Rome was constantly rebuked by other Bishops.
So to recap, Peter was not the first Pope, Peter was not in charge of the Church
(the 12 Disciples of Christ and Paul were), and the Bishop of Rome even hundreds
of years later was rebuked time and again for attempting to assert the claim
that his bishopric (or "see") was of authority any greater than any
one of the other Bishops.
-----
As time went on, Various Pastors and Bishops (which was the same title as
"pastor") began to write down the list of the books of the Bible used
in their areas and in their churches.
Now was that list always the same ? Much of the time, the list of the 27 books
was identical, so that we know that it is those books that were a) spread all
over the known world and b) recognized as being scripture.
---
But we should keep in mind 2 things:
1. the list of books that these various Pastors from all parts of the Roman
world wrote down almost always included the 27 books of the New Testament.
2. even when some of the N.T. Apocryphal books were mentioned, they were NOT
mentioned as being part of scripture, only that some of the apocryphal books
were sometimes read.
In other words, the presence of a few apocryphal books in some of the Churches
did NOT affect the Cannon of the N.T. Those who had the N.T. Cannon knew what
they had.
Vatican Ambitions for Jerusalem ?
- Protestant Bible Good Enough for Eastern Orthodox Church 100 Years ago - Problems in the Eastern Orthodox communities - Questions we had (and still do) for those who claim to be Eastern Orthodox - For those who know very little about the Septuagint - Historic Eastern Orthodox versions - HISTORY OF ARABIC VERSIONS of the BIBLE ARMENIAN GOSPEL of JOHN The Word of Jesus Christ - What he says about himself - Pontifex Maximus: Pagan Title or Christian Title - Historical Records - Apocrypha Free New Testament in LATIN - Free New Testament PDF in SPANISH - BUSH & RICE to PRESS FORWARD WITH PALESTINIAN STATE in JUDEA, SAMARIA & GALILEE - Uncovering the Secrets of the Septuagint - Creed of the Council of Nicea - Our QUESTIONS about the LATIN VULGATE
For P.C. - MAC - VISTA
- Go to our FREE EBook DOWNLOAD PAGE -
DIGITAL PDF EBOOK DOWNLOADS
CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE
- Textus
Receptus - Yes in Koine Greek (Scrivener) -![]()
- The History of the Doctrine of the Worship of Mary -![]()
- The Two
Babylons by Hislop -![]()
- The meaning of the Term BAPTIZEIN (BAPTIZE) -![]()
(with Secular and Early Church sources in Ancient Greek)
- Original Sources of the Koran -![]()
(By Christian Scholar Fluent in Arabic)
- Canon of the Old Testament and New Testament -![]()
Basis of Canonization of the Books of Old and New Testament - Princeton Scholar
Books
/ Ebooks / Bookfiles in MS Word or PDF
Format
- Yes, you CAN download ALL FREE EBooks
CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE
______________________
Please
Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe
Is not
correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention.
Thank you
(XOFC Staff)
Email us at xofcbooks6@yahoo.com
![]()
The
right to believe,
to
worship and
witness
The
right to change
one's belief
or religion
The right
to
join
together
and express
one's belief