NOW THAT CAFTA HAS PASSED -  

HOW TO RESIST IMPLEMENTATION 

 

Why CAFTA is Bad for you

The Dangers of the Central American Free Trade Agreement

 

 

 

U. S. A. flag; Mooney's Miniflags  AMERICAN BORDERS  TO BE DISMANTLED  U. S. A. flag; Mooney's Miniflags

*******************************************************************

 

 

CAFTA - The Actual Senate Bill 



DOMINICAN REPUBLIC-CENTRAL AMERICA UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT--MOTION TO PROCEED -- (Senate - June 29, 2005)


[Page: S7597] 
---
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader is recognized. 

Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I now ask unanimous consent that the Senate begin consideration of S . 1307 , the CAFTA legislation. 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? 

Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I object. 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard. 

Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I move to proceed to S . 1307 . 

Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays. 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? 

There is a sufficient second. 

The yeas and nays were ordered. 

CAFTA

 

The Three Senators most responsible for passage of CAFTA:

SENATE Sponsors of CAFTA: 

1 . Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA]  

2. Sen Frist, William H. [TN] - 6/23/2005 

3. Sen Reid, Harry [NV] - 6/23/2005 

 

CAFTA

 

S.1307 
Title: A bill to implement the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. 
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (by request) (introduced 6/23/2005) Cosponsors (2) 
Related Bills: H.R.3045 
Latest Major Action: 6/30/2005 Passed/agreed to in Senate. Status: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 45. Record Vote Number: 170. 


COSPONSORS(2), ALPHABETICAL 

(Sort: by date)
Sen Frist, William H. [TN] - 6/23/2005 Sen Reid, Harry [NV] - 6/23/2005 

 

 

 

S.1307 (Version B) [S.1307 RS]

Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Reported in Senate)

 

 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

  (a) SHORT TITLE- This Act may be cited as the `Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act'.

  (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

 
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

 
Sec. 2. Purposes.

 
Sec. 3. Definitions.

 

TITLE I--APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, THE AGREEMENT

 
Sec. 101. Approval and entry into force of the Agreement.

 
Sec. 102. Relationship of the Agreement to United States and State law.

 
Sec. 103. Implementing actions in anticipation of entry into force and initial regulations.

 
Sec. 104. Consultation and layover provisions for, and effective date of, proclaimed actions.

 
Sec. 105. Administration of dispute settlement proceedings.

 
Sec. 106. Arbitration of claims.

 
Sec. 107. Effective dates; effect of termination.

 

TITLE II--CUSTOMS PROVISIONS

 
Sec. 201. Tariff modifications.

 
Sec. 202. Additional duties on certain agricultural goods.

 
Sec. 203. Rules of origin.

 
Sec. 204. Customs user fees.

 
Sec. 205. Retroactive application for certain liquidations and reliquidations of textile or apparel goods.

 
Sec. 206. Disclosure of incorrect information; false certifications of origin; denial of preferential tariff treatment.

 
Sec. 207. Reliquidation of entries.

 
Sec. 208. Recordkeeping requirements.

 
Sec. 209. Enforcement relating to trade in textile or apparel goods.

 
Sec. 210. Regulations.

 

TITLE III--RELIEF FROM IMPORTS

 
Sec. 301. Definitions.

 

Subtitle A--Relief From Imports Benefiting From the Agreement

 
Sec. 311. Commencing of action for relief.

 
Sec. 312. Commission action on petition.

 
Sec. 313. Provision of relief.

 
Sec. 314. Termination of relief authority.

 
Sec. 315. Compensation authority.

 
Sec. 316. Confidential business information.

 

Subtitle B--Textile and Apparel Safeguard Measures

 
Sec. 321. Commencement of action for relief.

 
Sec. 322. Determination and provision of relief.

 
Sec. 323. Period of relief.

 
Sec. 324. Articles exempt from relief.

 
Sec. 325. Rate after termination of import relief.

 
Sec. 326. Termination of relief authority.

 
Sec. 327. Compensation authority.

 
Sec. 328. Confidential business information.

 

Subtitle C--Cases Under Title II of the Trade Act of 1974

 
Sec. 331. Findings and action on goods of CAFTA-DR countries.

 

TITLE IV--MISCELLANEOUS

 
Sec. 401. Eligible products.

 
Sec. 402. Modifications to the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

 
Sec. 403. Periodic reports and meetings on labor obligations and labor capacity-building provisions.

 

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

  The purposes of this Act are--

 
(1) to approve and implement the Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua entered into under the authority of section 2103(b) of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 3803(b));

 
(2) to strengthen and develop economic relations between the United States, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua for their mutual benefit;

 
(3) to establish free trade between the United States, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua through the reduction and elimination of barriers to trade in goods and services and to investment; and

 
(4) to lay the foundation for further cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of the Agreement.

 

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

  In this Act:

 
(1) AGREEMENT- The term `Agreement' means the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement approved by the Congress under section 101(a)(1).

 
(2) CAFTA-DR COUNTRY- Except as provided in section 203, the term `CAFTA-DR country' means--

 
(A) Costa Rica, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and Costa Rica;

 
(B) the Dominican Republic, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and the Dominican Republic;

 
(C) El Salvador, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and El Salvador;

 
(D) Guatemala, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and Guatemala;

 
(E) Honduras, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and Honduras; and

 
(F) Nicaragua, for such time as the Agreement is in force between the United States and Nicaragua.

 
(3) COMMISSION- The term `Commission' means the United States International Trade Commission.

 
(4) HTS- The term `HTS' means the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

 
(5) TEXTILE OR APPAREL GOOD- The term `textile or apparel good' means a good listed in the Annex to the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing referred to in section 101(d)(4) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(4)), other than a good listed in Annex 3.29 of the Agreement.

 

TITLE I--APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, THE AGREEMENT

 

SEC. 101. APPROVAL AND ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE AGREEMENT.

  (a) APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT AND STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION- Pursuant to section 2105 of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 3805) and section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2191), the Congress approves--

 
(1) the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement entered into on August 5, 2004, with the Governments of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, and submitted to the Congress on XX, 2005; and

 
(2) the statement of administrative action proposed to implement the Agreement that was submitted to the Congress on XX, 2005.

  (b) CONDITIONS FOR ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE AGREEMENT- At such time as the President determines that countries listed in subsection (a)(1) have taken measures necessary to comply with the provisions of the Agreement that are to take effect on the date on which the Agreement enters into force, the President is authorized to provide for the Agreement to enter into force with respect to those countries that provide for the Agreement to enter into force for them.

 

SEC. 102. RELATIONSHIP OF THE AGREEMENT TO UNITED STATES AND STATE LAW.

  (a) RELATIONSHIP OF AGREEMENT TO UNITED STATES LAW-

 
(1) UNITED STATES LAW TO PREVAIL IN CONFLICT- No provision of the Agreement, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, which is inconsistent with any law of the United States shall have effect.

 
(2) CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this Act shall be construed--

 
(A) to amend or modify any law of the United States, or

 
(B) to limit any authority conferred under any law of the United States,

 
unless specifically provided for in this Act.

  (b) RELATIONSHIP OF AGREEMENT TO STATE LAW-

 
(1) LEGAL CHALLENGE- No State law, or the application thereof, may be declared invalid as to any person or circumstance on the ground that the provision or application is inconsistent with the Agreement, except in an action brought by the United States for the purpose of declaring such law or application invalid.

 
(2) DEFINITION OF STATE LAW- For purposes of this subsection, the term `State law' includes--

 
(A) any law of a political subdivision of a State; and

 
(B) any State law regulating or taxing the business of insurance.

  (c) EFFECT OF AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO PRIVATE REMEDIES- No person other than the United States--

 
(1) shall have any cause of action or defense under the Agreement or by virtue of congressional approval thereof; or

 
(2) may challenge, in any action brought under any provision of law, any action or inaction by any department, agency, or other instrumentality of the United States, any State, or any political subdivision of a State, on the ground that such action or inaction is inconsistent with the Agreement.

 

SEC. 103. IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS IN ANTICIPATION OF ENTRY INTO FORCE AND INITIAL REGULATIONS.

  (a) IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS-

 
(1) PROCLAMATION AUTHORITY- After the date of the enactment of this Act--

 
(A) the President may proclaim such actions, and

 
(B) other appropriate officers of the United States Government may issue such regulations,

 
as may be necessary to ensure that any provision of this Act, or amendment made by this Act, that takes effect on the date the Agreement enters into force is appropriately implemented on such date, but no such proclamation or regulation may have an effective date earlier than the date the Agreement enters into force.

 
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE OF CERTAIN PROCLAIMED ACTIONS- Any action proclaimed by the President under the authority of this Act that is not subject to the consultation and layover provisions under section 104 may not take effect before the 15th day after the date on which the text of the proclamation is published in the Federal Register.

 
(3) WAIVER OF 15-DAY RESTRICTION- The 15-day restriction contained in paragraph (2) on the taking effect of proclaimed actions is waived to the extent that the application of such restriction would prevent the taking effect on the date the Agreement enters into force of any action proclaimed under this section.

  (b) INITIAL REGULATIONS- Initial regulations necessary or appropriate to carry out the actions required by or authorized under this Act or proposed in the statement of administrative action submitted under section 101(a)(2) to implement the Agreement shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be issued within 1 year after the date on which the Agreement enters into force. In the case of any implementing action that takes effect on a date after the date on which the Agreement enters into force, initial regulations to carry out that action shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be issued within 1 year after such effective date.

 

SEC. 104. CONSULTATION AND LAYOVER PROVISIONS FOR, AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF, PROCLAIMED ACTIONS.

  If a provision of this Act provides that the implementation of an action by the President by proclamation is subject to the consultation and layover requirements of this section, such action may be proclaimed only if--

 
(1) the President has obtained advice regarding the proposed action from--

 
(A) the appropriate advisory committees established under section 135 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155); and

 
(B) the Commission;

 
(2) the President has submitted to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report that sets forth--

 
(A) the action proposed to be proclaimed and the reasons therefor; and

 
(B) the advice obtained under paragraph (1);

 
(3) a period of 60 calendar days, beginning on the first day on which the requirements set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) have been met has expired; and

 
(4) the President has consulted with such Committees regarding the proposed action during the period referred to in paragraph (3).

 

SEC. 105. ADMINISTRATION OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS.

  (a) ESTABLISHMENT OR DESIGNATION OF OFFICE- The President is authorized to establish or designate within the Department of Commerce an office that shall be responsible for providing administrative assistance to panels established under chapter 20 of the Agreement. The office may not be considered to be an agency for purposes of section 552 of title 5, United States Code.

  (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2005 to the Department of Commerce such sums as may be necessary for the establishment and operations of the office established or designated under subsection (a) and for the payment of the United States share of the expenses of panels established under chapter 20 of the Agreement.

 

SEC. 106. ARBITRATION OF CLAIMS.

  The United States is authorized to resolve any claim against the United States covered by article 10.16.1(a)(i)(C) or article 10.16.1(b)(i)(C) of the Agreement, pursuant to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement procedures set forth in section B of chapter 10 of the Agreement.

 

SEC. 107. EFFECTIVE DATES; EFFECT OF TERMINATION.

  (a) EFFECTIVE DATES- Except as provided in subsection (b), the provisions of this Act and the amendments made by this Act take effect on the date the Agreement enters into force.

  (b) EXCEPTIONS- Sections 1 through 3 and this title take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

  (c) TERMINATION OF CAFTA-DR STATUS- During any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA-DR country, the provisions of this Act (other than this subsection) and the amendments made by this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to that country.

  (d) TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT- On the date on which the Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, the provisions of this Act (other than this subsection) and the amendments made by this Act shall cease to have effect.

 

TITLE II--CUSTOMS PROVISIONS

 

SEC. 201. TARIFF MODIFICATIONS.

  (a) TARIFF MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN THE AGREEMENT-

 
(1) PROCLAMATION AUTHORITY- The President may proclaim--

 
(A) such modifications or continuation of any duty,

 
(B) such continuation of duty-free or excise treatment, or

 
(C) such additional duties,

 
as the President determines to be necessary or appropriate to carry out or apply articles 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 3.21, 3.26, 3.27, and 3.28, and Annexes 3.3, 3.27, and 3.28 of the Agreement.

 
(2) EFFECT ON GSP STATUS- Notwithstanding section 502(a)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(a)(1)), the President shall terminate the designation of each CAFTA-DR country as a beneficiary developing country for purposes of title V of the Trade Act of 1974 on the date the Agreement enters into force with respect to that country.

 
(3) EFFECT ON CBERA STATUS-

 
(A) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding section 212(a) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 U.S.C. 2702(a)), the President shall terminate the designation of each CAFTA-DR country as a beneficiary country for purposes of that Act on the date the Agreement enters into force with respect to that country.

 
(B) EXCEPTION- Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), each such country shall be considered a beneficiary country under section 212(a) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, for purposes of--

 
(i) sections 771(7)(G)(ii)(III) and 771(7)(H) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(7)(G)(ii)(III) and 1677(7)(H));

 
(ii) the duty-free treatment provided under paragraph 12 of Appendix I of the General Notes to the Schedule of the United States to Annex 3.3 of the Agreement; and

 
(iii) section 274(h)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

  (b) OTHER TARIFF MODIFICATIONS- Subject to the consultation and layover provisions of section 104, the President may proclaim--

 
(1) such modifications or continuation of any duty,

 
(2) such modifications as the United States may agree to with a CAFTA-DR country regarding the staging of any duty treatment set forth in Annex 3.3 of the Agreement,

 
(3) such continuation of duty-free or excise treatment, or

 
(4) such additional duties,

  as the President determines to be necessary or appropriate to maintain the general level of reciprocal and mutually advantageous concessions provided for by the Agreement.

  (c) CONVERSION TO AD VALOREM RATES- For purposes of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to any good for which the base rate in the Schedule of the United States to Annex 3.3 of the Agreement is a specific or compound rate of duty, the President may substitute for the base rate an ad valorem rate that the President determines to be equivalent to the base rate.

 

SEC. 202. ADDITIONAL DUTIES ON CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL GOODS.

  (a) GENERAL PROVISIONS-

 
(1) APPLICABILITY OF SUBSECTION- This subsection applies to additional duties assessed under subsection (b).

 
(2) APPLICABLE NTR (MFN) RATE OF DUTY- For purposes of subsection (b), the term `applicable NTR (MFN) rate of duty' means, with respect to a safeguard good, a rate of duty that is the lesser of--

 
(A) the column 1 general rate of duty that would, at the time the additional duty is imposed under subsection (b), apply to a good classifiable in the same 8-digit subheading of the HTS as the safeguard good; or

 
(B) the column 1 general rate of duty that would, on the day before the date on which the Agreement enters into force, apply to a good classifiable in the same 8-digit subheading of the HTS as the safeguard good.

 
(3) SCHEDULE RATE OF DUTY- For purposes of subsection (b), the term `schedule rate of duty' means, with respect to a safeguard good, the rate of duty for that good that is set out in the Schedule of the United States to Annex 3.3 of the Agreement.

 
(4) SAFEGUARD GOOD- In this section, the term `safeguard good' means a good--

 
(A) that is included in the Schedule of the United States to Annex 3.15 of the Agreement;

 
(B) that qualifies as an originating good under section 203, except that operations performed in or material obtained from the United States shall be considered as if the operations were performed in, and the material was obtained from, a country that is not a party to the Agreement; and

 

 

 

 

 

CAFTA [House] H.R. 3045 [Version A] [IH]  

CAFTA [House] H.R. 3045 [Version B] [RH]  

CAFTA [Senate] S.R. 1307 [Version A] [IS]  

CAFTA [Senate] S.R. 1307 [Version B] [RS]

 

 

Getting involved in Politics

How Congress harms the American People

and constantly works against Freedom and against the Middle Classes of All Nations

 

 

CAFTA - The Politics (& Hidden Agenda) of CAFTA - Pulling out the stops...to oppress you

We Posted the Bill, but you should keep a few things in mind about Politics in Washington

 

This will take a few moments to read. Actually make an effort to do this, since it is your Freedom, your vitamins, your job, and Your Children that Congress is putting at risk.

 

1. For the Record, we want to welcome those who are new to the political process. We appreciate that you are finally waking up to the impact of Politics on your own life and the life of your children. The only way to preserve your country and your Freedom is to become involved, and to do so Frequently. Politicians DO listen to the people, especially when those people are consistent on certain issues. 

2. The Vast Majority of Americans are AGAINST Free-Trade Deals. The reason is that Most Americans now understand that "Free Trade" actually means "Slave Trade". 

Free Trade is the process of re-defining terms, legal concepts and international agreements in a manner that Force Middle Class people to compete against the Slave Wages of Totalitarian States and Third World Economies. 

 

3. It is Not true that the Fortune 500 companies produce most of the American Wealth. They produce much less than most of the small and medium businesses. But Fortune 500 companies (amazon link) can afford to hire dozens and dozens of lobbyists and to help politicians get re-elected. This is what those Multinational companies (amazon link) do, and the only way to compete against them is by NUMBERS, actually getting the NUMBER of people who are opposed to their policies to stand up and Remind Congressmen and Senators that the people actually VOTE. 

4. Multinational companies will promise the moon in order to get their own agendas enacted into law and legislation. Most of them ALREADY have huge tax advantages, that disregard the process of investing in the country and in the community in which they are located. Most Multinationals also constantly work against Human Rights and Free Speech.

5. A Trade Pact or Trade Agreement is usually nothing more than ensuring the continued Monopoly of immense corporations by garanteeing the continuation of their monopolies. Their goals - the most recent ones - is to run through the globe, exploiting the National Population of each country, and using them to extract profits at the expense of the people. The SAME corporations that used the Maquilladoras process on the US-Mexico Border where the workers had no rights and were essentially slaves to the corporations...are the same corporations (amazon link) that now want to do the same thing to Latin America and Central America...and ALSO Cause Americans to lose their own jobs in the process. 

6. The White House (presidential branch) is owned by Corporate and Multinational Corporate Interests.  These International Treaties are being protected and helped by 

1. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and

2. The Department of Commerce

 

7. It used to be that Government Agencies would help and serve the people. Now, Most government agencies actually hire lobbyists, pay them with taxpayer money, and try to influence policy and legislation so that Bureaucratic Accountability is REMOVED. Bureaucrats are actually using your money to Lobby AGAINST you !

8. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the U.S. Department of Commerce are the ones Most responsible for GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA, and WTO, and Codex Alimentarius Implementing Legislation. These agencies work AGAINST the U.S. and Against American Citizens.

9. Most people think that these agreements are about Jobs (Americans Losing their jobs) and Wealth (Corporate Monopolies). Don't Forget: 

International Agreements and Treaties are about HEALTH, your PHYSICAL HEALTH

- Most of these treaties have provisions that waive environmental controls and standards, and that waive INSPECTION of Poultry, Waive Inspection of Beef if each shipment is just under Two Tons, and Waive requirements to NOT use certain pesticides in Food Production. These issues affect each and every American on a Personal Basis, for decades and decades. 

10. The Way that Washington Works is that when the White House wants to make a deal, they agree to either remove Offending legislative SECTIONS, or to Change them. That way, the Congressman can say that he/she voted for the "Ammended" Treaty. 

This is - in 99% of the cases - simply a way to trick the voter. Yes, the Sections are removed. But about six months down the road, that same "removed" section is attached to a DIFFERENT Bill in Congress, and then becomes part of the Final Legislation and the Final Treaty in anycase. 


That way - The Senator/Rep. gets to SAY that they voted to take out certain provisions, but then they OMIT the fact of having included that same language and legislation in a DIFFERENT Bill. The ONLY way to defeat that...is to have the Legislators vote AGAINST the ENTIRE TREATY / FREE TRADE AGREEMENT...UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. 

 

Remember what Free Trade really Means:

It means that as the Global Corporations TRADE, YOU will work for FREE

 

11. Each Congress progressively makes things more complicated. But there are more and more people who are getting involved. But with each piece of legislation that works AGAINST the interests of Middle-Class Americans, once the legislation is passed, it is VERY difficult to get repealed. It is Much Easier to defeat the legislation BEFORE it takes effect, than AFTER it has passed. 

12. The Most Effective way to reach a Congressman (generic sense of use) is by FAX. IF you write letters, they never make it to the Congressmen because they are scanned. That's right: For "security reasons", you own representative can't read your actual mail. And even when they do read the scanned version, the fact of the scanning actually DELAYS your letter from reaching them. 

The Next best is to call them. But the Actual Best it to call them up, tell them you are for or against legislation, tell them you want to know HOW they plan to VOTE, and then ask them for their FAX number. Then, sit down, and handwrite a letter to Fax them, explaining simply why you are opposed to the legislation. 

 

13. Those of you who think that you will find a "smoking gun" in CAFTA are Dreaming. You need to understand how legislation works. There are some things in it, but many of the provisions are disguised. The most blatant example of a problem in CAFTA is where the CAFTA legislation keeps discussing the issue of Cars, Vehicles, Automotive Production, etc. The implication is that they are going to try to set up car factories outside of the U.S,, pay those people slave wages - and use that to compete with China

 

14. The reason why CAFTA should be opposed is that it is one more piece that erodes the Sovereignty and the BORDERS of the USA. 

IT TAKES BORDERS TO MAKE A COUNTRY !!!

 

CAFTA also further gives the WTO (World Trade Organization) additional control over the lives of Americans and allows an unelected body of Bureaucrats to Run the lives of Most Americans. 

CAFTA is not only its own Treaty or Free Trade Agreement. CAFTA is a legislative package designed to Implement more of the WTO and NAFTA package that already has become Law. 

 

15. Don't expect your congressman to tell you the truth about how he/she voted. Let them know that you will follow up and look up their vote in the congressional record, or to find their public statement of OPPOSITION to CAFTA. 

 16. Some people expect to find provisions in CAFTA about Codex Alimentarius. The Bureaucrats and United Nations employees are Much more sophisticated than this. Here is how the process works:

 

A. The United Nations designated the WTO (World Trade Organization) as the bureaucrats who will control All Trade (amazon link) and Commerce on the Planet. 

B. The World Trade Organization designated a Different Agency to set up, establish, monitor and Control the Global production and Distribution of Food, (amazon link) Supplements, Food Supplements and Vitamins

C. The World Trade Organization designated the Organization "Codex Alimentarius" to decide matters of Nutrition and health for YOU and Your family, regardless of your concerns or your agreement, or your specific medical condition. 

D. Thanks to NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement) and WTO legislation passed by the U.S. Congress, the United States agreed to GIVE UP SOVEREIGNTY in the area of Trade and Commerce (amazon link) and to be BOUND by the terms decided by the World Trade Organization. [the U.S. Congress passed NAFTA and WTO in 1994] 

[The Main Goals of WTO are three:

1. to ensure the continued monopoly of the largest corporations on the planet and EXPAND their control, and

2. To erode the laws and rights of Americans that are making it difficult for these corporations to control even MORE. 

3. To destroy all documents and laws that stand in their way (such as the Bill of Rights / Constitution/ etc). ]

 

E. Codex Alimentarius matters because it is ALREADY an established agency of the UNITED NATIONS, the WTO and NAFTA. There are Additional mechanisms for Control in CAFTA, but the process of gaining control over the U.S. Food Supply and Vitamins & Supplements, will continue in Anycase.

F. The U.S. Has the power to withdraw from Any Treaty it wishes to. It takes 6 months or less to do this, when they want. So the idea that just because WTO has passed Congress or just because NAFTA has passed - that these treaties cannot be repealed ...is NONSENSE. 

G. SENATOR LUGAR (Head of the Foreign Relations Committee of the U.S. Senate) despises the Sovereignty of the U.S. and the sovereignty of Its citizens. It is SENATOR LUGAR who ALSO has been working to implement and pass the LAW of the SEA Treaty, which would transfer much of the U.S. Navy to the Control of the United Nations. This Senator should be contacted by Fax and asked to Vote - in favor of the American People. SENATOR LUGAR - Rhodes Scholar - is a longtime Anti-American Socialist. He is an "Institutional Statist" who loves large Coporations and Corporate Monopolies. SENATOR LUGAR and has voted over and over to introduce and support NAFTA, CAFTA and every other International Treaty.  No Matter what the Treaty, if it HURTS the Average American, SENATOR LUGAR - Rhodes Scholar - will support all legislation that accomplishes this. Sen Grassley, ( Chuck) is also Very Reponsible for CAFTA.

 

Richard G. Lugar (R-IN) 
306 Hart Senate Office Building 
Washington, D.C. 20510-1401 
(202) 224-4814 
(202) 228-0360 fax 
senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov
 

 

 

For Those who care about    Codex Alimentarius , they should keep in mind that SENATOR LUGAR - Rhodes Scholar - is a member and former Chairman of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee

 

Just look up his TWENTY YEAR voting record. He has been trying to get the U.S. to give up MORE sovereignty to the United Nations by Passing the Law of the Sea Treaty [LOST] to force the U.S. to place its military assets under the Control of the United Nations. 

 

H. These Treaties must be opposed - Both NOW AND in the Future. The next one after CAFTA, is FTAA, the Free Trade Area of the Americas

This is barely on the Horizon. It was decided by the Department of Commerce and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. The FTAA was negotiated between 33 countries, including the U.S. and will take effect in December 2005, unless it is stopped

 

I. These Senators and Congressmen understand that the American people are waking up to how much DAMAGE these Congressmen have done to our country and how much control and sovereignty has already been eroded and given away. They are Afraid that the American people will find out. The problem is not only the Democrats or Republicans but BOTH parties. 

BOTH Parties work against Average Americans. If you Stay on their case, and learn to make your voice heard, You have a Chance to have a free country where you will still have rights. 

Make Your Voice Heard. IT is NOT ENOUGH to Actually Find out ABOUT CAFTA. You must let your congressman know that the CAFTA agreement/treaty is bad and should be opposed and Voted Down. 

 

J. Only YOU who Vote and Call - in your district - can make the difference. No One Else can do this for you. The Truth is that One Person Can Make a Difference, and those in Congress know this, and that is what scares them. 

Make your voice heard. Use your phones & Fax Machine. 

 


Arlen Specter (D-PA) 
711 Hart Senate Office Building 
Washington, DC 20510 
(202) 224-4254 
(202) 228-1229 fax (prefers email or phone) 
Web Form: specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInfo.Home    

 



Chuck Grassley, IA 
135 Hart Senate Bldg. 
Washington, DC 
(202) 510-1501 
(202) 224-3744 fax 
Web form: grassley.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home 



Senator Lugar Fake Republican - RINOs - Republican In Name Only

 

 

Richard G. Lugar (R-IN) 
306 Hart Senate Office Building 
Washington, D.C. 20510-1401 
(202) 224-4814 
(202) 228-0360 fax 
senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov
 

 

Lugar In Favor of CAFTA 




LUGAR IN FAVOR OF CAFTA



Thursday, June 30, 2005 

Biased Press Release by Lugar


U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Dick Lugar reaffirmed his support of the Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) in advance of the vote scheduled tonight.
 

“Over the past 15 years, Central America has made major strides toward fulfilling its people’s commitment to building secure and prosperous societies. The United States has a historic opportunity to consolidate this transformation and at the same time serve its own economic, political and security interests in the Americas,” said Lugar. 

The DR-CAFTA region is the 2nd largest U.S. export market in Latin America, behind only Mexico. The U.S. exports more than $15 billion annually to the region, making it America’s 10th largest export market worldwide. Currently 80 percent of products from Central America and the Dominican Republic already enter the U.S. duty-free due to unilateral preference programs such as the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI) and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). 

DR-CAFTA would provide reciprocal access for U.S. products and services to Central America. 

Securing greater market access and ease of entry into new markets will provide substantial new opportunities for American companies. The Farm Bureau Federation estimates DR-CAFTA could expand U.S. farm exports, including Indiana products such as corn, soybeans and pork, by $1.5 billion a year. 

In Lugar’s home state of Indiana, exports to the DR-CAFTA countries totaled $65 million in 2004 and have increased by $22.7 million or 54 percent since 2003. According to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce, manufactured goods, including plastics products, machinery, pharmaceuticals and medicines, accounted for 93 percent of Indiana’s merchandise exports to the DR-CAFTA region. 

The Department of Commerce analysis also notes that Indiana exports were spurred by past trade agreements. In the first year of the U.S.-Chile FTA, Indiana’s exports to Chile grew by 20 percent. Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed in 1993, Indiana’s combined exports to Canada and Mexico have increased by more than 188 percent. 

“Moreover, agreements such as DR-CAFTA must be part of the long-term solution to the problem of illegal immigration in the United States. Central Americans seek opportunities for advancement or survival in the United States because they lack real job opportunities at home. This is an unsustainable situation, and to change it, Central America’s economies must grow rapidly and diversify,” added Lugar. 

“Not only will DR-CAFTA significantly benefit our domestic economy, but also our global outlook. It presents an important opportunity to reinforce fragile new democracies with long-lasting development, a worthy goal which is also in the best of interests of the United States,” Lugar said. 

Source: Fair Use/ http://lugar.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=240047    

 

Bush Continues Anti-Sovereignty Push with CAFTA - Bush Continues Anti-Sovereignty Push with CAFTA - 

 

 

White House Barters for Trade Pact Votes

WSJ - 7/25 - The measure cleared the Senate on a 54-45 vote in June, after the administration cut a handful of side deals -- such as a pledge to New Mexico Democrat Jeff Bingaman to boost spending on labor-rights enforcement -- to help ease passage. But support lags significantly in the House, with informal counts suggesting it falls about 25 votes short of what is needed to ensure passage.

"Members of Congress simply will not associate their names and political futures with expansion of the Nafta trade model that most of the public views as a damaging failure," says Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, one of several advocacy groups fighting Cafta. (Nafta is the North American Free Trade Agreement.) Members of the National Farmers Union blanketed Capitol Hill last week, arguing that small family farms will be hurt by Cafta. AIDS activists are speaking out against provisions that tighten control of generic medicines in Cafta countries. The Citizens Trade Campaign, a coalition of labor, environmental, farm and faith-based groups, is running radio ads in the districts of wavering lawmakers that raise doubts about the benefits of free trade.

On the other side, free-trade business groups are pushing for Cafta, and administration officials are combing a "whip list" of more than 50 lawmakers who say their minds aren't made up. "It's full speed ahead," says
Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, who has met with some undecided members three or four times. He also has reached outside the Beltway, calling chief executives at pro-Cafta companies and giving interviews to newspapers and radio stations in key states, with the goal of rallying grass-roots support. Daily strategy is plotted on 7:45 a.m. conference calls that bring together officials from the White House, the office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the departments of Commerce, Treasury, State and Agriculture.

Full Story Here

 

 

 

The Hidden Agenda of the Law of the Sea Treaty

Hidden Agenda of the United Nations

 

 

Credentials of the U.N. Law of the Sea Court Judges

Informal Procedures of the U.N: the case of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) 

Law of the Sea Treaty Court (Tribunal)

Bush State Department still pushing for LOST Law of the Sea Treaty

 

 

 

 

Relevant BOOKS for those Interested:

 

Rats in the Grain: The Dirty Tricks and Trials of Archer Daniels Midland, the Supermarket to the World

 

Those with no background in the topics below may want to start here (short article: MECHANISMS OF CORPORATE RULE) 

 

The relationship between CAFTA and the Global Corporations is that it is THEIR Legislation, FOR them and AGAINST the MIDDLE CLASS.  Its hard to have both 1. slave wages AND 2. a Middle Class at the same time.

 

The Case Against Free Trade: Gatt, Nafta and the Globalization of Corporate Power

 

The Race to the Bottom: Why a Worldwide Worker Surplus and Uncontrolled Free Trade are Sinking American Living Standards 

Exporting America : Why Corporate Greed Is Shipping American Jobs Overseas by Lou Dobbs

Global Governance: Enhancing Trilateral Cooperation by The Trilateral Commission  (more Here)

 

When Corporations Rule the World 

Gangs of America: The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy 

 

Undue Influence: Wealthy Foundations, Grant Driven Environmental Groups and Zealous Bureaucrats That Control Your Future

(or take a look at this small piece on Environmental Agenda Setting)

 

Why Americans Hate Politics

The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special Interests, and the Betrayal of the Public Trust 

 

No Place for Amateurs: How Political Consultants Are Reshaping American Democracy

 

Toxic Sludge is Good for you

 

 

Indeed, the growth of the middle class-one of the underpinnings of democracy in this country-has been reversed. By government action.

Taken as a whole, these are results of the rules that govern the game:

 

 

Question: Is your Point of View "Right" or "Left" ?

We don't care about labels. We care about truth and facts, and believe that many sides have many pieces of the political truth about what is happening in the world. We are against large Multinational corporations that harm the people, impovrish countries, and destroy the middle classes. Our point of view is in believing in the Average American, and in the Integrity of the American Worker. We support the Middle Class, and government that stays out of the way of the People, and that will stop expanding and expanding and expanding its power, and its reach and its goals.  We cannot be in favor of multinational and globalist agreements that are designed either to hurt America or the American Worker or the Family (meaning Dad, Mom and the kids) - or that are designed to continue to harm and erode American Sovereignty because the politicians find the will of the people to be something which is "inconvenient".

 

"Left" and "right" are simply ways that Congressmen, their handlers and P.R. people attempt to divide the American People and get them to work against each other. The fact is that almost everyone is a Libertarian...in the sense that in their own home, they want to do whatever THEY chose, and they do not want Congress or anyone else telling them What to do, especially as long as it does not hurt anyone else. So basically everyone is born a Libertarian, regardless of what they call themselves. Most people also want a Fair Chance, The opportunity of a LEVEL playing field to guarantee the Freedom of Opportunity, where they can have and live their dreams or make the attempt. These Slave-Trade deals - disguised as Fair -Trade, are nothing more than the attempts of Corporations to permanently  make you poor and turn you and your family and to turn us all into economic slaves. 

No, we are not making this up. Many of those same corporations actually ran the slave trade and worked to implement that. Many of those same corporations fought against legally limiting the working day, and had decades and decades of forcing people to work for 12 to 14 hrs in very unsafe conditions. Many of these corporations also forced CHILDREN to work as  near slaves until the 1920s, and they STILL DO in other countries.  These Corporations work and make deals in countries that STILL have slave trade...to this day [yes - in 2005]. They try to "wine and dine" congressmen, and offer them almost anything in order to work against the PEOPLE that sent them to Washington. 

Their legislative efforts should be opposed through all lawful mean, and there are MANY Things that American can do to constrain, restrain, and curtail the power of these corporations.

 

There is no "one piece" of legislation that can be opposed. Most of them have to be opposed and to be opposed continuously. It is a long process. But liberty - a small amount of it - is all that remains with which to fight. If we do not use it to stand up, there will soon be no liberty left, and no country either.

 

 

"FREE TRADE": as the Global Corporations TRADE, YOU will work for FREE

 

Fight the movement of "Corporate Supremacy"

 

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

 

Back to Top