Necessity of Open Software ] Real News - Not Fake ] [ Does One Vote Count ? ] FRIST Supports Research on Babies ] IMMIGRATION BILL 2007 ] Fake Conservatives ] Fake Liberal - Real Liberal ] RFID Right to Know Act ] American Borders No More - Reasons ] Able Danger Weldon Facts ] PLO INFLUENCE AT THE UN ] POST OFFICE WORKS ON NOSY PROGRAM ] North American Development Bank ] Un Agendas ] 45 COMMUNIST Goals ] North American Development Bank -MEXICO ] New Rights 2008 ] Psychological ] Religious Vilification Bill ] Moral Capitalism ] ILLEGAL INVASION ] What is a Liberal ] Withdraw Harriet Miers ] NAVY HATES the name of JESUS ] John McCain Pro Abortionist ] John McCain No Conservative ] Why the World Hates USA ] Jimmy Carter - No Need for Words ] Immigration Reform ] BORDERS and IMMIGRATION ] Ashcroft ] Law Sea (1) [LOST] ] Law of the Sea Treaty COURT ] Base CLOSINGs ] Law of the Sea - Fish Stocks ] Law of Sea (2) - Actual ] National Right to Life Responds to McCain Slurs ] Terri Schiavo Case Update Page ] AMERICAN BORDERS TO BE DISMANTLED ] np 13 - Hand Scan ]

 

 

 

Does your one vote really count?

Does one vote really count? Yes. In fact, contrary to what people may believe, election histories prove that just one vote is often the difference between victory and defeat for a candidate or issue. Consider these historical examples: 


BY ONE VOTE: Americans in 1775 chose English over German as the official language of America. 


BY ONE VOTE: Thomas Jefferson won the Presidency over Aaron Burr when the election was thrown into the House of Representatives. 

BY ONE VOTE: John Quincy Adams became President in a deadlock between himself and Andrew Jackson in 1824.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1845 ONE vote brought Texas into the Union.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1868 ONE vote saved President Andrew Johnson from impeachment.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1876 ONE vote gave Rutherford Hayes the Presidency of the United States and ... ONE vote changed France from a monarchy to a republic.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1923 ONE vote gave Adolph Hitler leadership of the Nazi party.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1939 ONE vote passed the selective service act.(Draft Registration).

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1948 ONE vote per precinct in California gave Harry Truman the presidency.

 

BY ONE VOTE: 1960 ONE vote per precinct elected John F. Kennedy President of the U.S.


BY 87 VOTES: Lyndon B. Johnson was elected to the U.S. Senate over his opponent in a race in which there where
988,295 votes cast. 

Thinking people who hold to Biblical principles must not avoid the responsibilities of citizenship. To do so not only condemns our society to a moral abyss, but places each of us in violation of God's commandment to love our neighbor as we love ourselves. 

Pray before you vote. Ask God for wisdom on your selections. Research the candidates and the ballot issues. Voting is not only a privilege, it is a responsibility to your family, your neighbors and to future generations. 


Is involvement with the government scriptural? 

Both the Old and New Testaments contain instructions to God's people concerning their role in government. Some of the things that the Bible directs believers to do in relation to government are: 


Pray (1 Timothy 2:1-2) 
Participate (Romans 13:6-7) 
Improve your community (Nehemiah 2:17-18) 
Exercise stewardship (Genesis 1:28) 
Speak the truth publicly (Daniel 5) 

 

 

Reporters Moonlight as Corporate Hacks

"I'm not writing editorials for them," says Brownsville Herald environmental reporter Hector Garza-Trejo, in defense of his writing for Twin Plant News, a slick El Paso monthly that calls itself "the magazine of the maquiladora industry since 1985." (As this article was going to press, Garza-Trejo left the paper to work for a local law firm.) Meanwhile, Herald business reporter Tony Vindell has written articles and taken photos for the bi-monthly Maquila: Voice of Free Trade, which once listed him on its masthead as a contributing writer. "I don't see the conflict," says Vindell, who describes his free-lance pieces as "feature stories" about the maquiladoras. "They're not very controversial."

Full Story Here

 

 

 

 

Totalitarian Medical Health Control Plan - Sooner than you Think

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/index.htm 

 

 

 

KEY LEGAL CASES INVOLVING FREE SPEECH and the FIRST AMENDMENT 

(TO U.S. Bill of Rights, Rights that ALL American Citizens have)



Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496 (1939).
The United States Supreme Court held that citizens have a "guaranteed access" to streets, parks, and other "traditional public forum." The privilege to use the streets and parks for communication of views may be regulated in the best interests of all, but it must not, under the guise of regulation, be abridged or denied. Mere inconvenience to the government will not outweigh free speech interests. The government must use the least restrictive means of achieving legitimate, content neutral objectives. 


Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939). The United States Supreme Court did not allow cities to completely forbid leaflet distribution in order to prevent littering. The objective of keeping the streets clean does not outweigh the right to distribute literature in public. 


Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965). Public officials may not be given overly broad discretion to grant or deny permits or licenses for free speech. 

Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940). Speech may not be prohibited merely because it offends some listeners. 

Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951). The United States Supreme Court did not allow a permit to include any restrictions on a speaker's right of free expression. Permits may not be used as a prior restraint on free speech activities. Inappropriate or illegal activities may only be punished after they have occurred. 

Forsyth County v. The Nationalist Movement, 112 S.Ct. 2395 (1992). A city may not consider the listeners' reaction to a speaker when permitting free speech activities. 

Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965). Hecklers may not be allowed to veto a speaker's right of free speech. Police must control a crowd rather than arrest the speaker in order to maintain order. Regulations may be imposed on free speech to control traffic flow. 

Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969). Peaceful marching, chanting, and singing is protected by the First Amendment. 

Grayned v. Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (1972)
. Free speech expression may be regulated for noise content in appropriate places such as hospitals or schools while classes are in session. The general test is to ask whether the expressive activity is basically incompatible with the normal activities of a particular place at a particular time. Unamplified speech is permissible for "street preachers" on public streets.

 

 

Other Articles

 

 

 

Firefox in Full Release - Mozilla Firefox new Browser

 

 

 

 

****************************************************************************

*****************************************************************************

 

Immigration / Invasion Links - Get Involved !

 

www.SaveOurState.org 

-Grassroots for Each State

 

http://www.alipac.us/index.php 

 

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-2433.html 

 

http://www.teamamericapac.org/ 

 

Recent polls of Hispanics on immigration 

 

California Immigration/Invasion Issues

 


American Hispanics Fed Up With Illegal Immigration 

http://dontspeakforme.org/

 

 

 

****************************************************************************

*****************************************************************************