DOMA 101- Past News
July 2004 DOMA NEWS
Dobson: Senators 'cowed' by homosexual lobbyists
Most prepared & trying to vote against
Federal Marriage Amendment - Keep Calling !!
Posted: July 14, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
As the Senate debates the Federal Marriage Amendment, supporters of the
measure charge a number of lawmakers are afraid to vote according to their
inclinations because they fear the homosexual lobby.
"Many of them are bobbing and weaving from day to day," says
James Dobson, whose new political lobby group, Focus Action, has taken on
the proposed amendment as its first issue.
"A distressing number of U.S. senators and congressmen are being
cowed by the homosexual lobby and are afraid to support the
amendment," Dobson said in a letter to supporters of the lobby group
yesterday. "Indeed, many of them who ran as conservatives are running
instead for the tall grass."
Focus Action is registered as a separate, sister organization to Focus on
the Family, allowing it to engage in direct political lobbying and
campaigning.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., has scheduled a cloture vote
for today to prevent Democrats from filibustering. But Minority Leader
Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., says the amendment's supporters won't get the 60
votes they need to force a final up or down vote.
Gary Bauer, a former GOP presidential candidate lobbying for the
amendment, says there is only one way to interpret the outcome of the
procedural vote: "Senators who support traditional marriage will vote
for cloture. Senators who support homosexual 'marriage' will vote against
cloture."
President Bush supports the Federal Marriage Amendment, but Sen. John
Kerry and his running mate Sen. John Edwards are opposed. The Democratic
candidates say they are against same-sex marriage but want to leave the
matter to the states. Kerry's spokesman said both would be present if a
final vote came up but not for a procedural vote.
The proposed amendment reads: "Marriage in the
United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.
Neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any state shall be
construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be
conferred upon any union other than of a man and a woman."
To pass, the measure requires approval of two-thirds of
the Senate – 67 votes – and two-thirds of the House, then
three-fourths of the 50 state legislatures. But Dobson believes 64
senators are prepared to vote against it, which he calls an
"outrage."
He said he is encouraged, however, by several senators "on the
fence" who called his group's offices to communicate their support.
Bauer says "tens of thousands" of citizens have flooded the
Capitol Hill switchboard and congressional offices with phone calls in
favor of the amendment, virtually shutting down many senators'
communications systems.Keep Calling !!!
But Dobson says some lawmakers have given "ridiculous
excuses" for not backing the measure.
"Some of them claim they are unwilling to 'tamper' with the U.S.
Constitution, as though it is somehow evil to change it," he
says.
Meanwhile, many of these same senators welcome — and even encourage — the tactics of Liberal activist judges who regularly amend the Constitution not by democratic means, but by independent judicial decree!
He cites some examples of Senators who are planning to vote AGAINST DOMA:
"Marriage should be reserved to relationships between a man and a
woman. Only these pairings can produce children. But I do not believe an
amendment to the Constitution of the United States is the appropriate
answer at this time." – Sen. Kent Conrad, D, N.D.
"Changing the Constitution of the United States of America is a very
serious business and should only be used as a last resort." –
Sen. Max Baucus, D, Mont.
"I have a deep reverence for our Constitution,
and believe it should be amended only when absolutely necessary." –
Sen. John Edwards, D, N.C.
"Our Constitution has traditionally been used
to expand rights, not to restrict rights, and I do not support amending
it." – Senator Carl Levin, D, Mich.
"I believe that 'marriage' should be reserved
to a woman and a man, based on the long tradition and religious context of
the institution. But I see no need for a constitutional amendment." –
Sen. Bob Graham, D, Fla.
Marriage between a man and a woman is an honored
social and sacred institution that dates back thousands of years in
civilization. It is for this reason that I am opposed to same sex
marriages. However, I do not support amending the U.S. Constitution to ban
same sex marriage at this time." – Sen. Chuck Hagel, R, Neb.
"Though I oppose gay marriage, I believe a
constitutional amendment is neither appropriate nor necessary." – Harry
Reid, D, Nev.
Dobson says another "phony excuse" is that marriage is a state
issue.The DOMA legislation will have to go through State Houses even after
it is passed, in order for it to become a formal amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
Defense of Marriage ? Impending DEFEAT OF D.O.M.A.
(Defense of Marriage Act)
(Temporary setback towards permanent Progress)
Supporters are trying to bring the DOMA
legislation to a vote next week, currently there are not enough
votes. We were shocked to learn that senators - even in
conservative midwestern states - were not planning on supporting this amendment!
If you support the amendment, take the time to e-mail your Senator - they do listen if they hear enough voices, and
we undertstand they are not receiving much in the way of support for this amendment.
Here is a link to contact your
Senators:
http://www.senate.gov/index.htm
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL - Simulcast
July
11th Simulcast: Join Us Via TV, Web, or Radio
![]()
Days before the Senate votes on the marriage
protection amendment, Dr. James Dobson, Chuck Colson, former Seattle
Seahawk Ken Hutcherson and FRC Pres. Tony Perkins will broadcast a program
called, "The Battle for Marriage: Imminent Vote." If your church
has not yet signed up for this vital program, please call your church
today and ask that they do so.
![]()
This program will give you all the latest information on the status of the
amendment vote, and how you can get involved in this important battle for
the future of our country. To sign up for this program via TV or webcast
July 11th Simulcast: Join Us Via TV, Web, or Radio-Click Here
The Seduction of Our Youth: Christian
Parents Are Discovering It CAN Happen Here
This may well be one of the most important articles to be published. It is
written in response to numerous conversations I have had recently with
concerned Christians--including hurting parents and troubled pastors. The
concern is over the disturbing trend of Christian teens being lured away
from biblical faith and morality into a distorted, self-focused,
relativistic spirituality with broad, muddied sexual boundaries.
What they are learning through different forms of media and in school is
impacting a growing number of our young people.
Not long back the National Education Association and American
Psychological Association published and distributed a pamphlet entitled:
Just the Facts, sending it to school superintendents. The coalition's aim
was as follows:
1) to advise schools against sexual-reorientation therapy.
2) to warn administrators that gay clubs must be accepted;
3) to caution schools about scientific literature that presents
heterosexuality as the norm.[1]
I have mentioned on numerous occasions that most of the American
public--including Christians are clueless as to the diabolical, systematic
agenda the gay community has meticulously carried out over the past thirty
years.
For example, the removal of homosexuality as a psychological disorder from
the American Psychiatric Association's DSM (Diagnostic Statical Manual) in
the early 1970's was not the result of convincing, newly discovered
evidence which clearly established the theory that this sexual orientation
and expression was genetic (in-born).
On the contrary, it was the result of powerful, subversive gay activism.