
CODEX ALIMENTARIUS / WTO/ CAFTA / FTAA ACTION PAGE
Help Wanted - How you can Make a difference in the short and long term
![]()
governing globally, controlling locally
AMERICAN BORDERS - YOUR
COUNTRY
TO BE DISMANTLED
![]()
***********************************************
I Don't Understand why material on "American Borders" is Here
How to Fight Codex Alimentarius Commission
(Codex)
How to Fight NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA & WTO, Anti-Freedom Legislation
Get Real Information & Start Making a Difference
![]()
New Global Trade (anti-WTO) Website
Question:
Many health groups are wondering how to attack the recent passage of the bill (CAFTA), or those useless politicians supporting passage. Or perhaps it is more important to try to get support from our representatives to pull out of the WTO (joined in 1994), which controls the implementation.
How can they sell out our personal and national health rights to the world and not be responsible to us, the citizens?
Our Reply:
- Thanks for the note.
Your question has many levels, so we will try to answer a few points.
As you say, many health groups are wondering how to attack the recent passage of the Cafta bill.
These politicians don't want to face up to their votes, but their votes (to pass CAFTA and other such bills) are very wrong.
It is wrong to betray the people.
It is wrong to harm the voters
It is wrong to work against the people, and to sell their jobs abroad
to the lowest bidder.
These politicians almost always make "light" of comments that suggest that they are setting up
a system of slavery, but then if that conclusion is incorrect, then
why do they invest so much of their time and effort to
Export American jobs, with the full knowledge and awareness that so many family leaders (men and women) will
not have the funds to pay their bills or put food on the table for their families ???
In responding to them, we don't believe that Revoking CAFTA is enough
(though we do support REVOKING and cancelling CAFTA).
We believe that the problem must be resolved at its core, which means that
the USA should
withdraw from the
WTO (World Trade Organization).
Getting the USA to withdraw from the WTO would:
1 Freeze all regulations under NAFTA (also passed in 1994)
2. Restore the USA to rule by American Constitutional Law with Constitutional Rights
3. Stop and prevent Federal Agencies from either Joining with/or enforcing Codex Alimentarius, which is part of the WTO system of agencies.
4. Put the movement to dissolve the United States
Borders...on hold, and give us a chance to fight that upcoming legislation as well.
We realize this can be an uphill fight, but the longer we wait, the worse it gets. And its getting worse at a fast pace.
The way that these politicians manage to not
be accountable (sadly) - is:
A. to presume that we are ignorant
B. to make speeches where they just plain lie to us or deceive us, pretending that their position is one way,
when they vote a totally different way.
C. count on the ignorance of the American
people, to Not understand How these politicians are funded, and who pays for their re-election campaign.
How Congress & Politicians really "work"
It is sad to say, but most of the politicians not only don't care about the real issues, they do not even know what the real issues are. Many congressmen (generic) do not even read the legislation that they vote for or against, they just do what their "legislative assistants" suggest.
And many of those legislative assistants simply take their positions, from the "leadership" in
Congress. The top congressional leaders have teams of people paid to write support papers in favor or against certain legislation.
When the legislation comes up, rather than actually reading the actual legislation, most representatives and senators simply read the "position papers" on and
ABOUT the legislation rather than the legislation itself.
So their ineptitude is a combination of their own self-deceit as well as their willingness to mislead people.
What can be done...with your help
We have some documentation about these matters. We don't always have the space (at
this current site) to display them. We ALSO have many documents & articles
dealing with the U.N.
W.H.O. (World Health Organization) and from Codex Alimentarius
. These people are FAR MORE
ambitious and far-reaching than most people have any clue.
Their plans to regulate vitamins are only a Small percentage of everything they are trying to regulate. And once again - the problem is that
the Codex Alimentarius approach and objectives have the effect of harming everyday people.
There are ties to multinational corporations, and special interest groups that
want to medicate everyone, instead of allowing for natural supplements, vitamins
and minerals. Codex Alimentarius is actively working to regulate Minerals,
Juices, Nectars, and many OTHER products BEYOND simply Vitamins.
Maybe this all ties together. It is interesting to notice how these international agreements
seem to work in conjuction with each other, so that these treaties have provisions that seem to be "dormant" until the final piece of a treaty is passed in Congress (with a totally different name on THAT piece of the legislation), and then all of a sudden, we wake up to find ourselves under the control of another Treaty and another globalist
anti-people group.
![]()

We know that the politicians do not care much about the people. But we believe that we can "help" them to pay attention, and to get their attention, by publicizing many of their backdoor deals and supporters.
And if congress people knew that each time they voted that all of the facts would come out,
that could make a huge difference.
A lot of people remain confused because they do not know where
to look or how to find the evidence.
We love our country. American Values are positive values (Dont
confuse the actions of the Administration with the feelings of the American
people - Many people INSIDE the USA have NO IDEA what their own
government is doing OUTSIDE
of the USA). The USA domestically is STILL the best country in the world,
(Just our own view) and we cannot agree with those politicians that have tried to sell us down the drain. But they
may be responsible to the electorate, the people, if we each hold them responsible and
encourage them in the right direction.
Getting the information is crucial in efforts to resist being manipulated and deceived by politicians.
There are MANY MANY ways to make a difference on all of these issues. Do NOT believe the lie that One person or a few people cannot make a difference. Anyone who says that is lying to you.
The Fact is that One Person or a few people
CAN make a difference,
Keep us in your prayers,
Keep asking questions,
Thank you for your email.
![]()
Sample Documents (More Added maybe someday)
Read the Reports and find out for yourself: Government Officials Proud of their Progress
FTAA
- Free Trade
Area of the
Americas- Missed Deadline Prompts Efforts to Restart Stalled
Hemispheric Trade Negotiations - 2005 - PDF REPORT![]()
GAO
Government Report- FTAA Faces Challenges by Citizens 2003
But
Attempts to IMPLEMENT CONTINUE - PDF REPORT![]()
![]()
POTENTIAL TOPICS MORE EXTENSIVELY ADDRESSED AT DIFFERENT WEBSITE:
WTO, Codex Alimentarius Implementation, CAFTA treaty, FTAA, NAFTA Treaty, GATT, GATT founding (1948), Border Agreements, Trade & Food Agreements, What other International Documents to pay attention to, listing of which treaties are binding on the USA, listing of which politicians voted for or against all of the major treaties, discussions of who funds the treaties, Who Funds the specific campaigns - (the Major contributors) of all the members of congress that vote for these bills. We have the information, Who are the Lobby Groups, NGOs, Corporations, and other groups that are - in fact - lobbying for their own favor and willing to hurt everyday people,













Global Treaties - International Law - United Nations Protocols
International Conventions - MOU - United Nations Law
U.N. - UNDP - UNEP - COR - ECOSOC - UNICEF - UNCTAD - UNRAA - ITU
OAS -
----------------
Repeal & Withdraw from NAFTA
Repeal & Withdraw from CAFTA
Repeal & Withdraw from the WTO

Fight the fight !
Prevent the "globalization" of your own country !
We do not have to give in
We do not have to accept defeat
We do not have to accept Slavery
Saving this Country (USA) is Possible
We Can & Must work Together
![]()
"FREE TRADE" = as the Global Corporations TRADE, YOU will work for FREE
We would love to hear from you.
Please Feel Free to write to us and share your comments, and your concerns and questions.
Please
Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe
Is not
correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention.
Thank you

(Love your new (U.N.) flag ?)
![]()
AMERICAN BORDERS
TO BE DISMANTLED
![]()
***********************************************
Thanks for taking the time to read this Information
![]()
KEY LEGAL CASES INVOLVING FREE SPEECH and the FIRST AMENDMENT
(TO U.S. Bill of Rights, Rights that ALL American Citizens have)
Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496 (1939).
The United States Supreme Court held that citizens have a "guaranteed access" to streets, parks, and other "traditional public forum." The privilege to use the streets and parks for communication of views may be regulated in the best interests of all, but it must not, under the guise of regulation, be abridged or denied. Mere inconvenience to the government will not outweigh free speech interests. The government must use the least restrictive means of achieving legitimate, content neutral objectives.
Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939). The United States Supreme Court did not allow cities to completely forbid leaflet distribution in order to prevent littering. The objective of keeping the streets clean does not outweigh the right to distribute literature in public.
Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965). Public officials may
not be given overly broad discretion to grant or deny permits or licenses for free speech.
Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940). Speech may
not be prohibited merely because it offends some listeners.
Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951). The United States Supreme Court did not allow a permit to include any restrictions on a speaker's right of free expression. Permits may not be used as a prior restraint on free speech activities. Inappropriate or illegal activities may only be punished after they have occurred.
Forsyth County v. The Nationalist Movement, 112 S.Ct. 2395
(1992). A city may not consider the listeners' reaction to a speaker when permitting free speech activities.
Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965). Hecklers may
not be allowed to veto a speaker's right of free speech. Police must control a crowd rather than arrest the speaker in order to maintain order. Regulations may be imposed on free speech to control traffic flow.
Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969). Peaceful marching, chanting, and singing is protected by the First Amendment.
Grayned v. Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (1972). Free speech expression may be regulated for noise content in appropriate places such as hospitals or schools
while classes are in session. The general test is to ask whether the expressive activity is basically incompatible with the normal activities of a particular place at a particular time. Unamplified speech is permissible for "street preachers" on public streets.
__________________
IMPORTANT NOTE: Not to be construed as legal advice. This is not intended to be, and does not constitute, the giving of legal advice. It is only a summary of the legal rights of U. S. citizens. It's important that one understand and be aware of decisions by the U. S. Supreme Court.
OLD Contribution & support page
![]()
For the Record, We only advocate Peaceful Resistance