1602 Reina Valera Now Available
|
Spanish Bible Versions / Real & Fakes - The Modern Reina Valera | |
|
reina valera, fake bible, bible subversion, spanish niv problem, 1960 reina fake, united bible harm reina valera, reformation spain, bishop of toledo, complutensian polyglot, westcott hort, 1909, How
the Reina Valera Spanish Bible Versions Now
Use the Corrupt Texts of Westcott & Hort The Reina-Valera of 1960 is
the translation offered by Holman and other Publishers. This translation is the
product of the American Bible Society, which since 1910 has taken an Anti-traditional Textus
Receptus Stance. The American Bible Society routinely uses Greek and Hebrew
Texts which are NOT the Greek and Hebrew Texts used by the historic Christian
Church.
95%
of the Discovered Manuscripts & Parchments of the Bible in
Greek
do NOT agree
with the texts used
TODAY by the American Bible Society. Once there were two great translators Reina {Casiodoro de Reina 1520-1594} and Valera {Cipriano de Valera 1532-1625}. They were Protestants, and they were the translators of the Bible into Spanish during the era of the Reformation. In the case of Reina and Valera, they began their work as Roman Catholics. They were Roman Catholic Monks who actually were interested in the contents of the Bible. When they began to do research on the Bible, the Roman Catholic Church even encouraged their work and their scholarship. But when the Vatican found out that Reina & Valera [working separately originally] were finding that what the Vatican was saying doctrinally was false and errant, the Vatican feared that these scholars would survive and tell others. The Vatican send the Inquisition after Reina and Valera. They fled to Protestant Nations because they knew that they would be free to pursue their work of Scholarship. The Spanish Church actually predates the Vatican and Vatican Control. The Original Church Councils [Early Church History] that were held in Spain would simply be called Protestant by the labels of today. But that part of history is for another time. Those interested can pursue this matter in the Four Volume History of the Inquisition by Henry Charles Lea (available on this page http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/more_ebooks.htm )
Though the work of Reina and Valera does survive and is
available, most of the actual text of the original Reina-Valera has
been taken out of the Spanish Bible translations today which are still called
“Reina-Valera”. Quite Literally, Modern Spanish Bible Versions are "Reina-Valera" in Name Only
! Even in 1960, (and after 1910 if we need to be more specific) the American Bible Society omitted the Spanish Text used by Reina & Valera. And instead used the Corrupted Greek Texts of the United Bible Societies (in Spanish Sociedades Biblicas Unidas). This new Spanish Version they merely named it
and called it the "Reina Valera". All of the material underlying
the Reina-Valera after 1910 comes from Bible manuscripts which depart
from the Historical Texts used by Protestants for 2000 years.
After 1910, the American Bible Society began revising the Bible Texts
used for its Bible translations in accordance with the Corrupted Greek Texts
of Westcott & Hort. Just
to be sure our terms our defined, what are the Texts of the Bible used
by Protestants for 2000 years ? 1. The Old Testament
Textus Receptus is the 1525 Hebrew Text of Ben Chayyim (Ben Hakkim), published
originally in Venice by Daniel Bomberg 2. The New Testament Texus
Receptus (comprised of the texts of 1550/51 by Stephens {Stephanus/Stephanos/Estienne}
and 1624/1633 by Elzevier)
http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/free_ebooks_instant_downloads_pdf.htm Both of these texts/Textual Streams - of the O.T. Textus Receptus and the N.T. Textus Receptus are found in the Geneva Bible (English & French) /the Bible of Martin Luther, the King James Version and the Original Spanish Reina-Valera Bible Translation.
========================= What
are the New Greek Texts which are corrupt and which are at
variance with the Traditional Protestant Texts ? 1. The Old Testament translated by Ben Asher of which Kittel’s Version (Rudolph & Gerhard Kittel) is the most commonly used. (It is formally called the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia ). Kittel was not
Jewish, and he was not a native Hebrew speaker. So where did his expertise
come from ??? And how would you
defend using an Old Testament edited by someone who hates Jews ?
Rudolph Kittel was a German Occultist and Textual Critic. Gerhard
Kittel (his son) was a member of the Nazi Party (NSDAP). He was also on the
Faculty of the University of Tubingen, which had been working on its frontal
assault on the Protestant Reformation and the Bible for over a century through
“Textual Criticism”. Gerhard Kittel was High Priest to Hitler, and was
tried for Nazi War Crimes. But these facts never got in the way of Eerdmans’
publishing of the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Theologisches Wörterbuch
zum Neuen Testament), which is the work of Gerhard Kittel. Who would have
known that you can serve the Devil, Worship Hitler and impress some
Evangelicals all at once ? People today wonder where the
view originates among those who are anti-semitic, that the Jews of today are
not the same as the Jews of the Old Testament. One of the main authors of this
novel theory is Gerhard Kittel, who gave many public speeches about this topic
in his Nazi years, and who was an outspoken enemy of the Jews as early as
1933. No wonder Hitler liked him & worked with him. The Hebrew Old Testament of
Rudolph Kittel was “so proficient and accurate” in Hebrew, that the Jewish
People have NEVER accepted to use it in ANY of their Old Testament Copies. 2. A) The New Testament
translated by Tischendorf was compiled on the basis of his “re-discovered”
manuscript which ALTERED the historic Greek Text of the New Testament in more
than 3500 Places.
B) The New Testament formulated by Westcott and Hort follows the
Catholic Corrupt Text of Codex Vaticanus.
This is a corrupt Bible Manuscript and also includes other books not found in
the Bible (such as the Shepherd of Hermas), and 3 other Corrupt Greek
Manuscripts. The UBS
Red-Cover Greek Text New Testament [the UBS/Nestle-Aland
Version] is
the MAIN GREEK TEXT used in all “Accredited” Protestant Seminaries in the
USA). This UBS Greek New Testament combines the corrupted
Text of Tischendorf with the corrupted
Text of Westcott & Hort. This is
not something we have made up. Find out for yourself. Just
pick up a copy of the Red Cover UBS (United Bible Societies) Greek New
Testament and read its introduction by Aland or Nestle.
All Spanish Reina-Valera texts after 1910
base their New Testament on the UBS Red-Cover Greek
Text
New Testament. Its Old Testament is the
false Ben Asher/Kittel version of Biblia
Hebraica Stuttgartensia. While both the O.T. & N.T.
used are from the United Bible Societies, it should be noticed that both of
these Bibles come from the German Bible Society ( Deutch
Bibelgesellschaft).
Surprise of all surprises, the German Bible Society (largely as a result
of failed German Biblical Textual Criticism) is committed to reversing the work
of the Protestant Reformation. In Essence the GBS (German Bible Society) is the
UBS (United Bible Societies). The Deutch
Bibelgesellschaft also retains the Copyrights
both to Kittel’s corrupt Old Testament and the corrupt Red-Cover Greek Nestle-Aland
New Testament. It was the German Bible
Society, working through Nestle (who published the first Modern Corrupt
Greek New Testament in 1898), who convinced the British Foreign & Missionary
Society (around 1904) to reject the historic text of the Bible used by
Protestants for 2000 years, and instead use the Corrupt Manuscripts of Nestle
(Based on Tischendorf/Westcott & Hort). The German Bible Society
continues its misguided work today under the guise of "Scholarship" through the
United Bible Societies. It is a kind of
"scholarship" that contradicts 95% of the New Testament Parchments and
Manuscripts which have been discovered. It is said that More Bible
Manuscripts have been discovered in the 20th century than in all
other previous centuries combined. That is true ! However, what is often not
disclosed is that the Bible Manuscripts
discovered in the 20th century continue to point to the Textus
Receptus as being the oldest and most reliable texts of the New Testament. In other words, The UBS, Tischendorf, and
Westcott & Hort would not want you to know that 95% of all New Testament
Manuscripts discovered to date Agree with the Textus Receptus. What is the Solution ?
IF you want a real & true Bible in Spanish, which is the Reina-Valera from the Historic Translation of Casiodoro de Reina and Cipriano de Valera, you must obtain a Bible/New Testament from Before 1908. Versions of the Reina Valera after 1860 are usually corrupt and have their contents Changed and Altered. We do offer - for FREE - the PDF EBOOK of the 1831 Spanish Reina-Valera New Testament.
We have upgraded to the Earlier 1831 Spanish Reina-Valera/Valera New Testament. It is much closer to the original Greek to Spanish translation of 1602. Click on the picture above to be taken to Free Instant Download Instand PDF Ebook Page
For more information: 1.
The Revision Revised by John
William Burgon
3. The Jesus Papyrus (recent International Bestseller) where the Textus Receptus text of the Gospel of John is dated to 60 AD. (This book was also published as Eyewitness to Jesus : amazing new manuscript evidence about the origin of the Gospels / Carsten Peter Thiede and Matthew d'Ancona New York : Doubleday, 1996)
Purchase one of the books we offer and support this ministry !
we can be reached at: xofcbooks2@yahoo.com
FREE GENEVA BIBLE NEW TESTAMENT (1560) IN PDF
Monthly Support of XOFC for $
10.00 (USD)
XOFC: Truth & Education for the Skeptical Mind
Please
Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe Is not
correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention. Thank you (XOFC Staff)
Email us at xofcbooks@yahoo.com | |
.PNG)
