David Strauss ] [ Semler ] VON SODEN - AVAILABLE ] Lachmann ] F.C. Baur ] NKJV Hodges&Farstad MT ] Knowing W & H - Conclusions ] Wettstein ] Gerhard Kittel ] Tischendorf 1 ] The Unbound Scriptures - A Biblical Critique - Part 1 ] The Unbound Scriptures - Critique - Pt 2 ] The Unbound Scriptures - Critique - Pt 3 ] textual criticism newtestament1 ] textual criticism newtestament2 ] UBS Red Cover NT ] DeWette ] GRIESBACH ] Majority Text ] Bengel ] Von Soden ] Kittel & His Version ] Kittel and the O.T. ] Miles Coverdale ] Westcott & Hort ]

 

 

Scofield Never Agreed with Westcott and Hort

Westcott & Hort 

THE NETWORKS OF WESTCOTT  & HORT

 

SEMLER

 

SEMLER, JOHANN SALOMO (1725—1791), German church historian and biblical critic, was born at Saalfeld in Thuringia on the 18th of December 1725, the son of a clergyman in poor circumstances. He grew up amidst pietistic surroundings, though he never became a Pietist. 

In his seventeenth year he entered the University of Halle, where he became the disciple, afterwards the assistant, and at last the literary executor of the orthodox rationalistic professor S. J. Baumgarten (1706—1757). In 1749 he accepted the position of editor, with the title of professor, of the Coburg official Gazette. But in 1751 he was invited to Altdorf as professor of philology and history, and in 1752 he became a professor of theology in Halle. After the death of Baumgarten (1757) Semler became the head of the theological faculty of his university, and the fierce opposition which his writings and lectures provoked only helped to increase his fame as a professor. His popularity continued undiminished for more than twenty years, until I 779. 

In that year -he came forward with a reply (Beantwortung der Fragmente eines Ungenannten) to the Wolfenbuttel Fragments (see REIMARUS) and to K. F. Bahrdt’s confession of faith, a step which was interpreted by the extreme rationalists as a revocation of his own rationalistic position. Even the Prussian government, which favoured Bahrdt, made Semler painfully feel its displeasure at this new but "really not inconsistent aspect" of his position. But, though Semler was really not inconsistent with himself in attacking the views of Reimarus and Bahrdt, his popularity began from that year to decline, and towards the end of his life he felt the necessity of emphasizing the apologetic and theologically conservative value of true historical inquiry. In other words, Semler's popularity began to decline as people began to realize just how liberal of a theologian he was.

His defence of the notorious edict of July 9, 1788, issued by the Prussian minister for ecclesiastical affairs, Johann Christoph von Wollner (1732—1800), the object of which was to ensure Lutheran orthodoxy, might with greater justice be cited as a sign of the decline of his powers and of an unfaithfulness to his principles [ that is - his "principles" of betraying historical Protestantism]. He died at Halle on the 14th of March 1791, worn out by his labours, and disappointed at the issue of his work.

The importance of Semler, sometimes called" the father of German rationalism," in ‘the history of theology and the human mind is that of a critic of biblical and ecclesiastical documents. He was not a philosophical thinker or theologian, though he insisted, with an energy and persistency before unknown, on certain distinctions of great importance when properly worked out and applied, e.g. the distinction between religion and theology, that between private personal beliefs and public historical creeds, and that between the local and temporal and the permanent elements of historical religion. In other words, Semler began the process of trying to separate the influence of personal belief and theology - from what a professor or teacher agreed to teach Publically. His great work was that of the critic, which means that he made great efforts to attack the Bible.

 

 He was the first to reject with "sufficient proof" [!!! ???] :

 1 .the equal value of the Old and the New Testaments, 

2. The uniform authority of all parts of the Bible,

 3. The divine authority of the traditional canon of Scripture, 

4. The inspiration and "supposed correctness" of the text of the Old and New Testaments,

5. And, generally, the identification of revelation with Scripture. 

Though to some extent anticipated by the English "deist" Thomas Morgan, Semler was the first to take due note of and use for critical purposes the opposition between the Judaic and anti-Judaic parties of the early church. He led the way in the task of discovering the origin of the Gospels, the Epistles, the Acts of the Apostles, and the Apocalypse. He revived previous doubts as to the direct Pauline origin of the Epistle to the Hebrews, called in question Peter’s authorship of the first epistle, and referred the second epistle to the end of the 2nd century. In other words, Semler tried to establish a rivalry between the early Messianic Christians and the Gentile Christians, and then used those theories to suggest that the Bible had been tampered with, by one group or the other (depending on which Biblical book). He suggested that Peter never wrote 1 Peter, and suggested that Peter also Never wrote 2 Peter, and that it should be dated to more than 100 years after Peter. IN other words, according to Semler, 1 & 2 Peter are fraudulent in their claims and authenticity.

 

He wished to remove the Book of Revelation altogether from the Bible. In textual criticism Semler pursued further the principle of classifying MSS. in families, adopted by R. Simon and J. A. Bengel. In church history Semler did the work of a pioneer in many periods and in several departments. Friedrich Tholuck pronounces him "the father of the history of doctrines," and F. C. Baur "the first to deal with that history from the true critical standpoint." At the same time, it is admitted by all that he was nowhere more than a pioneer. (This means that he is admired by those who came after him, in his work of being among the first professors of Theology to attack the Authenticity of the Bible and Jesus Christ)

Tholuck gives 171 as the number of Semler’s works, of which only two reached a second edition, and none is now read for its own sakes.

 

When discussing the issue of a Textual Critic, Semler was among the first to attack the Bible openly. If the attack on the Bible had come from Catholic Theologians, then Protestants would have understood the implications and the problems. But many of the Protestant Theologians by the early 1800s had been greatly affected by philosophers who saw in religion the manifestation of all sorts of problems, both real and imagined. 

Theologians in German quickly gained control of most of the Universities, and then used these positions to lead astray as many of the students as possible. While everywhere else the Protestant Reformation had been celebrated for bringing in liberty and knowledge of the Bible, professors were using theology to undermine the Protestant Reformation as much as possible. The work that Semler and a few others began - were continued by their successors, many of whom came to the United States and taught in American Seminaries, while the majority of Americans were thinking that most of their future pastors were actually at Seminary learning about reasons to Trust the Bible, rather than reasons why God and the Bible should be understood as Fraudulent.

 

 

 

 

Sources: Ravenous Wolves: Textual Criticism and the Abandonement of the Reformation- A History of HIgher Criticism and German Theology by Lichtenberger. In addition, the works of the subjects of this biography, and Early Editions of Ency. Brit. 

 

 

For P.C. - MAC - VISTA 

- Go to our FREE EBook DOWNLOAD PAGE -

DIGITAL PDF EBOOK DOWNLOADS

CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE

- Textus Receptus - Yes in Koine Greek (Scrivener) -

- The History of the Doctrine of the Worship of Mary -

- The Two Babylons by Hislop -

- The meaning of the Term BAPTIZEIN (BAPTIZE) -

(with Secular and Early Church sources in Ancient Greek)

- Original Sources of the Koran -

(By Christian Scholar Fluent in Arabic)

- Canon of the Old Testament and New Testament -

Basis of Canonization of the Books of Old and New Testament - Princeton Scholar

Books / Ebooks / Bookfiles in MS Word or PDF Format

- Yes, you CAN download ALL FREE EBooks  

CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE

 

 

 

 

Books / Ebooks / Bookfiles  Also available in PDF Format

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buy one of the books we offer, and help Support this Ministry !

 

 

 

FREE SPANISH REINA_VALERA INSTANT DOWNLOAD 1831 N.T .NOW RELEASED 

 

 

Please Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe

Is not correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention.

 

Thank you

(XOFC Staff)

 

 

Email us at xofcbooks2@yahoo.com