Home BOOKS Q & A - Catholic EasternOrthodox _HARM CHRISTIANS? For Women LINKS Hebrew Roots why CAFTA is BAD Politics GIBSON/PASSION MORMONISM Pastor's Corner for NEWBIES Purpose Driven Israel PRAYER Modern Versions Welcome OiL & RESOURCES HELP WANTED KJV/ Versions archeology P.A. & SHARIA VATICAN & JERUSALEM Satanology 101 Textual Criticism _INTRO TO XOFC The Trinity _CODEX ALIMENTAR WORD-FAITH MIDDLE EAST Anglican Lutheran

David Strauss ] Semler ] VON SODEN - AVAILABLE ] Lachmann ] F.C. Baur ] NKJV Hodges&Farstad MT ] Knowing W & H - Conclusions ] Wettstein ] Gerhard Kittel ] Tischendorf 1 ] The Unbound Scriptures - A Biblical Critique - Part 1 ] The Unbound Scriptures - Critique - Pt 2 ] The Unbound Scriptures - Critique - Pt 3 ] textual criticism newtestament1 ] textual criticism newtestament2 ] UBS Red Cover NT ] DeWette ] GRIESBACH ] Majority Text ] Bengel ] Von Soden ] Kittel & His Version ] Kittel and the O.T. ] Miles Coverdale ] [ Westcott & Hort ][CATHOLIC BIBLES][Israel]

 

 

Scofield Never Agreed with Westcott and Hort

 

 

Westcott & Hort

 

Rudolph Kittel (his own Words) Available by Ebook

Secret  Rapture ?

Rapture Verses

Rapture and Tribulation

Free 1800s Rapture Ebook

 

 

 

Several sources have suggested that Westcott & Hort played key roles

in the founding of the Occult "Society for Psychical Research", through their

founding of that society under its original name, the Ghostly Guild

 

Of Course, Textual Critics and friends of the Nestle-Aland Text don't seem to want you to

know this, because to prove this would cause major problems for a Greek Text

such as the Text of Nestle, which is largely based on Westcott & Hort. 

 

    The first step in this process is to demonstrate that Westcott & Hort knew several 

other leading Cambridge Graduates, who ALSO were involved in the Ghostly Guild.

 

The following below is a Biographical Dictionary. It happens to be published by Oxford University.  You will please note carefully what this says about the Greek New Testament Text that Westcott & Hort were working on together. Supposedly, the Revision of the Greek Text of the New Testament - started in 1871. Of course That little "official" fact created its own problems. Many Pastors are under the impression that Westcott & Hort only directed the translation of their "Revised Version". 

They are unaware that Westcott & Hort went so far as to supply the Greek Texts that those translation & revision committees (from 1871 forward) worked on. This is very important, because it proves that the outcome of the Greek Texts was controlled by Westcott & Hort, and that far from a process of independent Collation or evaluation, 

the only real work that the Revision Committees engaged in, was to translate the [fake] Greek Texts that Westcott & Hort placed in front of them. After this work was completed, - at that point - the Revision committee would vote on whether to accept this translation or Not. 

But no independent evaluation was ever done - by the Translation committee of the Revised Version - of the Greek Texts provided by Westcott & Hort. And that left a rather big problem unresolved, that still needed to be accounted for. 

If the Translation & Revision committee of the Revised Version Never actually determined for themselves which Greek Texts to translate from, then from what source did those Greek Texts come from ?

Yes, of course we have just said that those texts came from Westcott & Hort, (which is what Burgon discloses in his book, the Revision Revised). 


But where did Westcott & Hort get their Greek Texts from ? To simply produce a Greek Text out of thin air would take a great deal of work. It would take, more precisely, a number of years. 

------

 

Well now we actually have the solution clarified to us by the Biographical Dictionary from Oxford. The answer to the issue of the source of the Greek Texts of Westcott & Hort is to know: That Westcott & Hort did NOT begin working on their Greek Texts in 1871. 

No, 1871 was simply when the Revision Committee began ITS work. Westcott & Hort began theirs Decades earlier, precisely 1852. That explains where those Greek Manuscripts of Westcott & Hort came from. They had nearly 20 years of a head-start, to decide which false texts to select from. 

Now if 1852 was the date of the beginning, something else becomes important. 

It is alleged that Westcott & Hort only created the Ghostly Guild as a kind of "foolishness" when they were still in College. Well, that may sound fine to those who are easily led astray, but remember - these were men who were in training to be PASTORS

Westcott & Hort were at Cambridge doing the work of Seminary Students. If anyone would have known not to become involved in the Occult, it would be Seminary Students. So it is hard to dismiss the behavior of Westcott & Hort and their involvement in the Occult merely as something "juvenile". 

 

But another fact comes to mind: In 1852, Westcott & Hort WERE in College. And THAT is when they began working on the Greek New Testament that they would manage to present to everyone later (in 1881) as the Revised Version of the Bible. 

 

 

So let us make these points clear:

1. Westcott & Hort were in College in 1852

2. Westcott & Hort founded the Ghostly Guild when they were in College

3. Westcott & Hort were already working on their own invented Greek Text by 1852.

 

 

 

Conclusion: By 1852, Westcott & Hort had founded the Ghostly Guild, AND had begun work on the Revised Version of the Bible. 

WHY does this matter ?

 

Because it demonstrates that there is a strong and deliberate link between the time period that Westcott & Hort were in the Ghostly Guild, and the time period that they worked on their Bible Translation. 

 

In other words, when W & H were working on the Bible, they most clearly were under the influence of the Occult.  As we have time to explain more about the Ghostly Guild, you will be able to see & learn just how occult their Ghostly Guild was. This was hardly the innocent games of children. 

 

The Biographical Dictionary also provides more substantiation about Westcott & Hort knowing others who were also involved in the Ghostly Guild:

E. W. Benson,  and

J.B. Lightfoot

 

 

ller, kjv only, kutilek, bad theology, poor schoolar, british museum, 

 

 We are working on a lot of material, but there is only

so much time in the day.  Keep praying for us, so that we can continue to 

inform and help others.

 

 

Criteria for Accurate Koine Greek Manuscripts to Translate From

Textual Criticism - Part 1 - Book of Matthew - Textual Criticism - Part 2 - Mark & Luke 

 

 

 vatican, vatican corruptio

Our 

OOOn, archeo

Questions to think about

Compare the KJV translators to the lives of the Translators of the Modern versions, such as Westcott & Hort.

 

1. Did the 46 KJV Translators deny that Jesus is the Christ ?

Westcott & Hort did.

2. Did the 46 KJV Translators have Roman Catholic Theology ?

Westcott & Hort did.

"I wish I could see to what forgotten truth Mariolatry (the worship of the Virgin Mary) bears witness." (Westcott, Life & Letters- Ibid. )

 

"The pure Romanish [Roman Catholic] view seems to be nearer, and more likely to lead to the truth than the Evangelical." (Hort, Life and Letters, Vol. I, p. 77)

 

3. Did the 46 KJV Translators say that Genesis 1 through 3 never occured ?

Westcott & Hort did.

4. Were the 46 KJV Translators involved in the Occult ?

Westcott & Hort were.

5. Did the 46 KJV Translators despise evangelicals ?

Westcott & Hort did.

"Evangelicals seem to me perverted. . .There are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, especially the authority of the Bible." (Hort, The Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. I, p.400)

 

6. Did the 46 KJV Translators decide to use Manuscripts that they knew were in historical disagreement with the Texts of the Bible ?

Westcott & Hort did.

"Our Bible as well as our Faith is a mere compromise." (Westcott, On the Canon of the New Testament, p.vii).

 

7. Did the 46 KJV Translators chose the Codex Vaticanus that contradicts 98% of the rest of Biblical Manuscripts in Greek ? or did they rather instead use Greek and Hebrew texts that had been used by the Christian church and agreed with the 98% of other Biblical manuscripts ?

Westcott & Hort did.

Proof on Westcott & Hort can be found in "The Revision Revised" by Burgon.

logical bible, westcott theosophis, westcott theosophy, 

neo platonism, bad priests,  nestle al

and, hort occult, baptist history, free

 

TEXTUS RECEPTUS - NO REGISTRATION -

 FREE NEW  TESTAMENT DIGITAL PDF - DOWNLOAD PAGE

FREE PDF - THE GREAT TEXTUS RECEPTUS IN ANCIENT KOINE GREEK

masonry baptist, waldensian,

codex sinaiticus vaticanus  von soden, molenkot, ubs, united bible societies, bible third, third wave, 

 

More on the Westcott & Hort Circle of Revision Revised advocates 

 

 

bible versions, new age

The Metaphysical Club and the Question of Truth

 bible, niv tniv, translation committee, mollencott, mollenkott, molencot,

One of the Editions of the Corrupted Greek New Testament Text

 

 

The N.T. texts used by

Westcott & Hort favored either

1) Heresy

2) Corrupt Manuscripts and

3) Vatican Texts.

Neither Westcott nor Hort

believed that Jesus Christ died

for their sins.

They did however, participate in seances and meetings to deliberately

contact Demonic Spirits, according to their memoirs.

niv problems, niv tniv heresy, coogan, stott, hell, graham heretic, cumbey blavatsky,

 

"Paul says that the Spiritual man judgeth all things. We are told to watch our life and our doctrine closely. If we have high standards for our friends and who our Pastor is, should those standards be any lower for those who are handling the Holy Word of God, especially if they claim to be the transmitters of this document to us...who will have to live by it and based on what they have written and the words these translators chose ?"

 

____________________________________ 

 

The Real Question is what are you going to do with the information that was presented in this article.

 

Is the Information True ?

Is the Information Accurate ?

Is the Information documented ?

Do I - before God - have a responsibility if I am a Christian to accept and act on the information in this article ?

Am I comfortable in the knowledge, that some leaders under the guise of clarifying the text of the Bible, are actually changing that text, and changing MY understanding of what God wants to share with me through His Holy Word, the Old Testament and the New Testament ?

Do I understand that these "small" changes number from the hundreds to the THOUSANDS depending on which Modern Versions I use, and that these changes serve to cut away the clarity and the specific understanding found in the Greek New Testament, that these new modern versions are preventing me from understanding ?

Do I understand that most of these new Modern Versions were not developed because there was a genuine need, but because the teams of Bible Translators were Hired by PUBLISHING companies who are eager to make a profit on the Word of God, which remains the Number ONE bestseller every week of every year, and that these Publishers decided to cash in ?

Do I understand that the problem was that if these Bible Adjusters and Correctors did NOT make the changes that they chose to, that they would not be able to claim copyright protection, and therefore they would not be able to make a financial Profit from their new versions ?

Do I understand that there are Spiritual Forces that want to prevent me from having GREATER spiritual understanding about God, but that God himself is always in MORE of a hurry than I am, for Me to get to know HIM ?

Do I realize what my personal state of preparation will be, within me, when Islam becomes the Dominant Religion in the United States, as it is already in Europe, and how I will personally be required to defend my Faith, by argument and persuasion, using knowledge of the Bible and of History and of Christianity, and that God will rightly hold me accountable because I am claiming to be His Child and a personal follower of Jesus Christ ?

In view of these facts, should I try to set aside more time for the study of the Word of God, and more time for the study of History and the true history of the Christian Church, and to learn about how other Christians in the past, actually learned to have and to gain GREAT spiritual strength ?

If no one reaches out to help prepare me for the coming challenges, whose job is it STILL for me to be prepared to answer these challenges and questions ?

 

FREE Ebooks for your encouragement, consideration and learning (PDF) Page can be found here: http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/free_ebooks_instant_downloads_pdf.htm 

 

I Peter 3:15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:
 

II Timothy 2: 15 Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scofield Never Agreed with Westcott and Hort

 

 

FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE

 

FREE  NO COST -EBOOKS BB

CLICK HERE TO BE TAKEN TO FREE DOWNLOAD PAGE

 

YES - CFREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE

 

 

FREE GENEVA BIBLE  NEW TESTAMENT (1560) IN PDF

 

For More Books

on the History of the Church of England, please visit 

our Anglican Books & History page

 

 

 

FREE SPANISH REINA_VALERA INSTANT DOWNLOAD 1831 N.T .NOW RELEASED 

 

 

 

 

Support this Ministry - Buy a Book !

Purchase one of the books we offer and support this ministry !

 

 

 

 

Please Note: We do try to be accurate. If you see anything which you believe

Is not correct on our website, please do bring it to our attention.

 

Thank you

(XOFC Staff)

 

 

 

 

 

 

test graphic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information posted on this page specifically under license of Distributed Content Agreement.

@ 2002/2003 License Holders.