"sobriety" of Westcott & Hort vs truth of the bible 

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you further disputing the scholarship of Hort (a Cambridge Professor) whose pioneering work on the Greek text of the New Testament is noted for its accuracy and the sobriety of its judgements?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



What Scholarship ? What sobriety of Judgement ? Do you have real facts to suggest that Westcott & Hort demonstrate any sobriety ? What facts are those ? 

The the sobriety of their judgement in denying that Jesus is the Christ ?

The sobriety of their judgement in their Vatican Catholic Theology ?

The sobriety of their judgement in rejecting that Genesis 1 through 3 never occured ?

The sobriety of their judgement in being involved in the Occult ?

The sobriety of their judgement in despising evangelicals ?

The sobriety of their judgement in deciding to use Manuscripts that they knew were in historical disagreement with the Texts of the Bible ?

The the sobriety of their judgement in chosing Codex Vaticanus that contradicts 98% of the rest of Biblical Manuscripts in Greek ?

 

IF any ONE of these points is true, that would be a serious problem. IF any one of these points were true, it would be the basis for ensuring that these men would not be allowed to be our Pastor.


Yet many will pick up their work and accept false translations. As to their "sobriety of Judgement", I think this exists mainly in the minds of their defenders, such as yourself.

This is what I meant by the "presumption of credibility". You are granting Westcott & Hort your presumption that they are credible. And the more research you do into that topic, the more you will find that Westcott & Hort were enemies of the one Jesus Christ and of Christianity.

We offer The Revision Revised by John Burgon as a PDF Ebook for FREE.