Power Grab of the Pope
New Roman Emperor ?
True History of the Latin Vulgate Version of the Bible
Render unto the Pope...
Adrian Hilton says
that the E.U. is a means of undoing the Reformation and extending
Vatican
sovereignty over Britain
Render Unto The Pope...
The Spectator - UK
Adrian Hilton says that the EU is a means of undoing the Reformation and
extending Vatican sovereignty over Britain...
This realm of England is an Empire ...governed by one Supreme Head and King.' So
proclaimed Thomas Cromwell in his most critical piece of legislation, the Act in
Restraint of Appeals in 1533. By calling England an empire, he designated it a
sovereign state, with a king who owed no submission to any other human ruler and
who was invested with plenary power to give his people justice in all causes.
Interestingly, the Act's critics in Parliament were not so much concerned by its
doctrinal corollaries, as by the fear that the Pope might retaliate by
organising a European trade embargo against England. The Pope, of course, laid
claim to the ultimate divine right. He was, after all, the Vice-Christ,
appointed to establish one unified empire under one emperor, belonging to one
Church under one God.
England finally rid itself of papal interference in the
Bill of Rights of 1689,
which declared that 'no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath
or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or
authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.' It may have taken
440 years from Cromwell's foundational declaration, but entry in 1973 to the
'European Economic Community' brought England back into the Catholic fold, and
exactly 460 years after the English monarch was declared sovereign, the present
Queen was reduced to vassal status under the terms of the Maastricht Treaty,
which rendered her a European citizen and thereby subject to 'foreign princes
and potentates'.
The issue of European religious union is one that has been concealed even deeper
than the plans for political union, but the ratchet towards a Catholic Europe is
just as real. The Pope's recent demand that 'God' be featured in the emerging
European constitution has been echoed by many leading Catholic politicians and
bishops. While on the surface such a reference may offend only Europe's atheist
and humanist contingent, it must be observed that when the Vatican refers to
God, she sees herself as God's infallible vice-regent upon earth, the leading
organ of divine expression; indeed, according to its publication Dominus Iesus
(5 September 2000), as the only mediator in the salvation of God's elect,
insisting that all other Churches, including the Church of England, 'are not
Churches in the proper sense'.
The Roman Church is founded on a political dogma claiming that the Pope is
'supreme ruler of the world'; superior to all kings, prime ministers and
presidents. These spiritual and temporal claims remain very much fundamental
dogmas of Catholic teaching, permitting the Pope, through Cardinal Ratzinger,
the Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to issue clear
directives to Catholic politicians on how they should vote. Since their
obedience is considered a 'moral duty', devolve everything to the overwhelmingly
Catholic European Council of Ministers, Commission and Parliament, and the
ultimate Caesar is the Pope.
Such would be the fulfilment of a Sunday Telegraph article (21 July 1991) which
stated: 'Karol Wojtyla is calmly preparing to assume the mantle which he
solemnly believes to be his Divine Right - that of new Holy Roman Emperor,
reigning from the Urals to the Atlantic.' The Catholic Church is achieving this
through its political wings - the Christian Democrat and Christian Socialist
parties - with the EU's 'Founding Fathers' now reaping the ultimate reward:
sainthood. The Pope has beatified Alcide De Gasperi, Robert Schuman and Konrad
Adenauer for founding the Union 'on Roman Catholic principles'. A supporter of
their canonisation said it shows that Europe 'was built upon a rock', adding, 'I
think that the European Union is a design not only of human beings but of God.'
The very act of bestowing sainthoods on politicians is purposely designed to
inculcate that European unification is God's will, and that those who lead it
govern by divine right.
During the 1975 referendum campaign, Shirley Williams unambiguously associated
the vision of Europe with Rome's goal of assuming political and religious
authority over the lives of all Europeans. She observed, 'We will be joined to
Europe, in which the Catholic religion will be the dominant faith and in which
the application of the Catholic Social Doctrine will be a major factor in
everyday political and economic life.' While the EU has adopted many symbols of
nationhood (a passport, flag, anthem and currency) and is now moving towards the
attributes of government (a president, foreign secretary, global ambassadors at
the UN and G8), it follows that, since Europe has no unified demos, a 'deeper'
cohesive force is necessary to hold the whole project together. When Cardinal
Maria Martini of Milan addressed the European Parliament in 1997 in a symposium
on Remembering the Origins of the Process of Integration, he identified this
'deeper' something - effectively a common state religion - reminding the
Parliament that its true foundation was a religious one. He outlined the
importance of a single faith (Catholicism), and emphasised that religions must
not support nationalisms (i.e., the Church of England must not defend the
English constitution), and Europe must recognise the 'primacy of the divine'
(i.e., the primacy of the Pope). His address included demands for a new welfare
state, in accordance with Roman Catholic social doctrine, and his contention
that European integration was never about economic and monetary issues alone. He
said, 'The Europe we must build is a Europe of the spirit.'
When divinity rules, it is, of course, infallible. According to canon law, the
Pope claims immunity from all moral and civil authority: 'The First See is
judged by no one.' This is precisely the spirit in which the EU governs, with
the Court of Justice deeming that political criticism of its leaders is akin to
the most extreme forms of blasphemy. It is therefore possible to suppress it
without violating freedom of speech, affording the EU an undefined and seemingly
unlimited power to restrict political criticism. Like the Papacy, the Court is
supreme, accountable to no one, and the sole arbiter of citizens' 'rights'. Lord
Shore, in his book Separate Ways, observed that the Commission acts precisely
'like a priestly caste - similar to what it must have been in pre-Reformation
days, when the Bible was in Latin, not English; the Pope, his cardinals and
bishops decided the content of canon law'.
Accordingly, any decision of the people which does not accord with the divine
will has to be corrected. The very notion of 'destiny' is simply a euphemism for
government by divine right, and this is the teleological explanation for three
referendums in Denmark on the Treaty of Maastricht, two referendums in Ireland
on the Treaty of Nice, and the suspension of democracy altogether in Belgium and
Italy in order to ratify treaties or force through budgets. In each referendum,
there is a 'wrong' and a 'right' outcome. It also accords with the EU's
sanctioning and funding of 'acceptable' political parties, i.e., those who
ultimately accord with its own aims. When the United Kingdom votes no to the
euro, the wrath of God will be poured out again and again until the people
repent and accept their predestined fate.
Such a destiny can be foisted upon recalcitrant nations only when they are
weakened. The Roman principle of divide and rule is resurrected in the 'Europe
of Regions' strategy, which encourages each 'region' of Europe to look directly
to Brussels for policy and funding, bypassing national parliaments in the
process. This is a recreation of a mediaeval Europe of small, ineffectual states
which can be easily dominated. The ecumenically minded Church of England has
been complicit in the fracturing of England, with its bishops chairing regional
conventions, but the Ecumenical Movement is in reality a parallel front to
Rome's divide-and-rule strategy. When Cardinal Bea stated that 'no concessions
in dogma can be made by the Church for the sake of Christian Unity', he was
simply reiterating Rome's belief about itself. Any movement or concession is
only ever on the part of the subsidiaries, since the centre is infallible.
There are significant structural parallels between the Roman religious system
and the political subsidiarity principle, which is itself a concept of papal
origin. In the theory of ecclesial authority, an important part is played by the
concept of the representation of One Christ, who combined in himself all the
offices for the dispensation of salvation (prophet, priest and king). If the
Church is ruled by God, then God must necessarily flow down from above, step by
step, so at the apex of human order there must be a single channel, directed by
God himself, and only at the lower levels could the streams of God's will begin
to branch into subsidiary levels. Subsidiarity was designed not to permit the
tributaries to 'claw back' what may best be performed at a lower level, but to
permit the infallible centre to decide what freedoms to grant the subsidiary
levels. Whether it be termed federalism or centralism, 'subsidiarity' denotes
the downward devolvement of certain powers for the practical outworking of the
Supreme Power's objectives.
There is much debate about whether the EU is a democracy, a theocracy, an
oligarchy or a collective dictatorship, but at root it is none of these. It is
an amphictyony - a confederation of states established around a religious centre.
A Catholic EU will inevitably result in the subjugation of Britain's Protestant
ethos to Roman Catholic social, political and religious teachings. The Queen's
coronation oath 'to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom according to their
laws and customs' and 'to maintain the Protestant Reformed religion established
by law' is negated by the process of deeper European integration. It is almost a
symbolic confirmation of the Queen's vassal status that a 20p coin of Gibraltar
bears an engraving of Mary crowned 'Our Lady of Europa' - the suzerain spiritual
authority - while the Queen is stripped of her usual titles DG, REG., FD - Queen
by the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith.
Under the constitution for Europe, the EU will have a Catholic Caesar presiding
over the Protestant monarch. The former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak
once made a plea for 'a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all
people' and added, 'Be he God or the Devil we will receive him.' The allegiance
of the Queen's subjects is usurped by the demand for allegiance to the suzerain
power; a spiritually unifying allegiance which is primary, for without the unity
of the demos, the European vision will die. Accession to the constitution for
Europe would finally confirm that the United Kingdom yields to the suzerain
European Ecumenical Community - an empire in which everything belongs to Caesar,
and where Caesar is God. Rendering the euro unto him would be all that remains
for this vassal state to perform.
Adrian Hilton is a former parliamentary candidate and author of The Principality
and Power of Europe. He teaches Philosophy and Religious Studies. He is an
approved candidate for the Conservative party.
Pope on Good Terms with Leaders in Syria
Source:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old§ion=current&issue=2003-08-30&id=3450
For P.C. - MAC - VISTA
- Go to This FREE EBook DOWNLOAD PAGE -
DIGITAL PDF EBOOK DOWNLOADS
CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE
- Textus
Receptus - Yes in Koine Greek (Scrivener) -![]()
- The History of the Doctrine of the Worship of Mary -![]()
- The Two
Babylons [Secret History of Vatican] by Hislop -![]()
- The meaning of the Term BAPTIZEIN (BAPTIZE) -![]()
(with Secular and Early Church sources in Ancient Greek)
- Original Sources of the Koran -![]()
(By Christian Scholar Fluent in Arabic)
- Canon of the Old Testament and New Testament -![]()
Basis of Canonization of the Books of Old and New Testament - Princeton Scholar
Books
/ Ebooks / Bookfiles in MS Word or PDF
Format
- Yes, you CAN download ALL FREE EBooks
CLICK HERE TO GO TO FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD PAGE
New Roman Emperor ?
![]()
THERE IS NOT ONE CHRISTIAN NATION ON EARTH WHERE MUSLIMS ARE PERSECUTED.
Yet in most nations where the majority of the population are Muslims, there is systematic government persecution of Christians.
NO HAY UNA NACIÓN CRISTIANA EN LA TIERRA EN DONDE PERSIGUEN A LOS MUSULMANES.
Con todo en la mayoría de las naciones donde está musulmanes la mayoría de la población, hay persecución sistemática del gobierno de cristianos.
CI NON È UNA NAZIONE CRISTIANA SU TERRA DOVE I MUSULMANI PERSECUTED. Tuttavia nella maggior parte delle nazioni dove la maggior parte della popolazione è musulmani, ci è persecution sistematico di governo dei cristiani
ER IS NIET ÉÉN CHRISTELIJKE NATIE TER WERELD WAAR MOSLIMS WORDEN VERVOLGD. Maar toch in de meeste naties waar de meerderheid van de bevolking Moslims is, is er systematische overheidsvervolging van Christenen
NÃO HÁ UMA NAÇÃO CHRISTIAN NA TERRA ONDE OS MUÇULMANOS PERSECUTED. Contudo em a maioria de nações onde a maioria da população é muçulmanos, há um persecution sistemático do governo dos cristãos.
ES GIBT NICHT EINE CHRISTLICHE NATION AUF MASSE, IN DER MOSLEMS VERFOLGT WERDEN. Dennoch in den meisten
Nationen, in denen die Majorität der Bevölkerung Moslems sind, gibt es systematische Regierung Verfolgung der Christen.

"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."
--Article 18 of the Universal
Declaration of
Human
Rights--
![]()
Christian Conversions - According to the Bible - Can NEVER be forced.
Any Conversion to Christianity which would be "Forced" would NOT be recognized by God. It is in
His True and KIND nature, that those who come to Him and choose to believe in Him, must come to Him OF
THEIR OWN FREE WILL.
Don't Let anyone tell you that Christians support Forced Conversions.
That is False. True Christianity is NEVER forced.
_______________________
_______________________
Le conversioni cristiane - secondo la bibbia - possono MAI essere forzate. Nessuno che fossero un cristiano allineare forzerebbero o compell chiunque da diventare un cristiano contro il loro propri. Il motivo per questo è quello che agisce contro la volontà o contro l'intenzione di qualcuno sia un'azione di disrespect al dio. Alcuna conversione a christianity che sarebbe "forzato" non sarebbe riconosciuta da God. È nel suo allineare e la natura GENTILE, quella coloro che viene a lui e sceglie credere in lui, deve venire a lui della LORO PROPRIA VOLONTÀ LIBERA. Il dio cristiano è abbastanza grande capire come rispondere a coloro che decide che non desiderano conoscerle o capire. Il lavoro dei cristiani deve continuare a comunicare l'amore del dio a tutto che sia disposto a sentire parlare di esso. Molti popolano persino oggi, non desiderano sentire parlare del dio cristiano. Più specificamente, che cosa quella gente non desidera è affinchè senta parlare della bontà del dio cristiano. Quella gente è impaurita che se scoprite circa la bontà e la qualità e l'amore del dio cristiano, quello che potete desiderare per scoprirgli più circa. E quella gente è impaurita che il dio che servono sarebbe opposto a vostro scoprire la verità circa il dio di christianity che offre per sempre la vita Eterna a coloro che chiede esso e decide credere in lui e scoprire più dal libro denominato "il nuovo Testamento". Quello è il timore reale di coloro che oppone il dio cristiano. Non lasci chiunque dirvi che il supporto dei cristiani abbia forzato le conversioni. Quello è falso. Il christianity allineare non è MAI forzato
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
![]()
Core Universal Rights
The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one's belief or religion
The right to join together and express one's belief
_______________________
Las Derechas Del Universal De la Base
La derecha de creer, de adorar, de explicar y de atestiguar la derecha de cambiar su creencia o religión la derecha de ensamblar junto con otras y de expresar su creencia
_______________________
Diritti Dell'Universale
Di Nucleo La destra credere, adorare, spiegare e testimoniare la destra cambiare la sua credenza o religione la destra unirsi insieme ad altre ed esprimere la sua credenza
_______________________
De Universele Rechten van de kern
Het recht om en het recht te getuigen zijn geloof of godsdienst te veranderen het recht te geloven, te aanbidden, te verklaren samen met anderen toe te treden en zijn geloof uit te drukken
_______________________
중핵 보편적인 권리
자기의 신념 또는 종교를 변화하는 권리를 믿, 숭배하, 설명하, 목격하는 권리 다른 사람와 함께 결합하, 자기의 신념을 내색하는 권리
_______________________
Καθολικά δικαιώματα πυρήνων
Το δικαίωμα να θεωρηθεί, να λατρευτεί, να εξηγηθεί και να βεβαιωθεί το δικαίωμα να αλλαχτεί η πεποίθηση ή η θρησκεία κάποιου το δικαίωμα να ενώσει μαζί με άλλους και να εκφραστεί η πεποίθησή κάποιου
![]()
Stand up for Human Rights. Help Support Freedom of Speech, Freedom of thought and Freedom of Conscience - for all.